Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Posted by
Dan Mauch
on 2000-03-23 08:49:46 UTC
That is correct. It should be run under dos but you can load it from
windows. Of course you will have the effect of running it usder the windows
dos prompt so it would be better to simply boot it up in dos to eliminate
the joy of running windows. :)
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: jguenthe <jguenthe@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com>
Date: Thursday, March 23, 2000 7:22 AM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
windows. Of course you will have the effect of running it usder the windows
dos prompt so it would be better to simply boot it up in dos to eliminate
the joy of running windows. :)
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: jguenthe <jguenthe@...>
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com>
Date: Thursday, March 23, 2000 7:22 AM
Subject: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
>From: "jguenthe" <jguenthe@...>running
>
>So why not just run it under plain old dos 5 or 6 without windows?
>
>John Guenther
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: stratton@... [mailto:stratton@...]
>Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2000 10:18 AM
>To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@onelist.com
>Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
>
>From: stratton@...
>
>> The software (emc dos real time) isn't quite ready. I have a copy
>> on a 486-66 but it is too slow. I need to put it on my 133mhz machine. By
>> slow I mean that I can only get it to run at 20 ipm on the 486-66.
>Features?
>> All the codes in emc plus 130 line look ahead. I hope to get some more
>time
>> today and run some of the other commands.
>> I check with the author and see what his timeline is.
>>
>> So far I have found that it will run under windows dos command
>
>It may run under the windows DOS command, but it won't do so with the
>real-time-determinism of versions running on either Linux or NT with
>an appropriately patched kernel.
>
>You might be able to get comparable behaviour with windows' 'reboot to
>DOS' mode and a TSR realtime scheduler.
>
>Chris
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2000-03-22 18:01:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Bob Bachman
2000-03-22 18:10:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
wanliker@a...
2000-03-22 18:33:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Dan Mauch
2000-03-23 06:51:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
stratton@m...
2000-03-23 07:14:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
jguenthe
2000-03-23 07:22:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Dan Mauch
2000-03-23 08:49:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
wanliker@a...
2000-03-23 13:30:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Dan Mauch
2000-03-23 14:38:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
wanliker@a...
2000-03-25 09:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Dan Mauch
2000-03-25 11:26:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
wanliker@a...
2000-03-25 15:31:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
wanliker@a...
2000-03-26 08:16:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Steve Carlisle
2000-03-26 08:31:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Tim Goldstein
2000-03-26 11:07:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Tim Goldstein
2000-03-26 17:54:42 UTC
DeskNCRT
Fred Smith
2000-03-27 17:42:25 UTC
Re: RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dan's announcement
Bob Bachman
2000-03-29 15:53:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] DeskNCRT
joe
2000-07-04 06:48:26 UTC
DeskNCRT