Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Lathes for retrofit

Ballendo;

Thanks for the additional information! By the way who is the venodr
for the BV20 lathe?

By the way I'm not opposed to mixing manual and CNC funtionality on the
same machine as long as the two don't interfere with each other.
There are certainly times when manual functionality comes into play.
Most of the "professional machining" that I do is in the context of
maintaining plant equipment. The quotes around porfessional machining
are there because I do not consider myself a professional machinest by
any means, and working under production pressures oftens leads to less
than stellar machining anyways.

Thanks
Dave



ballendo wrote:

>David,
>
>Snips, inserts below:
>
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "David A. Frantz"
><wizard@e...> wrote:
>
>
>>As far as actual conversion what advantages foes the Lathemaster
>>lathe provide over the others? It does seem to be difficult to
>>get comments form people concerning the Lathemaster lathe. The
>>are always plenty of comments on how to get the HF and Grizzley
>>lathes running but very little on the Lathemaster.
>>
>>
>
>The chief advantage of the lathemaster for CNC is what I mentioned;
>there is less stuff to remove and/or work around to complete the
>conversion. The reason there is not much about it on my 9x20Lathe
>group is that for manual use, the "std" 9x20's are far superior,
>except for a steel only shop where the lower speed at teh bottom end
>is appreciated. Less so with modern tooling...
>
>Which brings me to the next consideration for a CNC conversion, the
>drive train of a CNC lathe is likely going to be an upgrade to a VFD.
>A lathemaster has spindle gears which may allow for more flexibility
>when using a cheap VFD setup (I'm not a fan of cheap Import gear
>trains, so I'd just drive it direct.) But again , the Lathemaster has
>less "junk" in the way to remove(Can we just call it a Bv20 style?
>The "lathemaster" is just a popular version OF the Bv20.)
>
>
>
>
>>It is interesting your comments on the manual aspects of the
>>Grizzley, HF and similar lathes. That is all well and good but if
>>you really want flexibility, even for manual operations, the
>>rational thing to do would be to motorize those axis. Hardinge
>>has been doing this for just about forever on their tool room
>>lathes, unfortunately not direct drive but very flexible none the
>>less.
>>
>>
>
>You're preaching to the choir here<G> My 9x20Lathe group is the
>opposite of here; nearly entirely manual users, so we tend to stay
>OFF the subject of CNC, the same way here we stay OFF the subject of
>manual machining... (Personally, I like and use both manual and CNC,
>but not on the same machine! I still think preserving the handwheels
>on a CNC retrofit is a poor choice.)
>
>
>
>>Thanks
>>Dave
>>
>>
>
>You're welcome.
>
>Ballendo
>
>
>
>