Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Posted by
Kim Lux
on 2003-12-17 06:35:47 UTC
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 03:01, ballendo@... wrote:
most stand alone controllers offer, even the old ones.
I started with V3.24c to be exact.
higher than me control whether or not this stuff makes it into the
public domain.
Kim Lux <lux@...>
> Kim,I agree. However, even a stock TCNC package is pretty close to what
>
> Many great points. BUT...
>
> How many of them stand up without YOU in the equation???
most stand alone controllers offer, even the old ones.
> In other words, how many people do you think could do the pascalAgreed.
> programming you have done to make your version of TCNC? And of those
> who CAN program pascal, how many would have the time and inclination
> to help someone who knows machining, but NOT programming? (After all,
> you've just told us about two people who CAN'T get to where you are,
> or they wouldn't be asking you to set up their CNC...
> What this all leads to is that for most people, Doug is correct. AnV3 doesn't have these problems. I made my changed to V3, not V4 code.
> older commercial control (as he says, not necessarily 15 years old,
> when you have 15K bux to spend) will run circles-(and you know why
> I'm making that pun if you're familiar with TCNC-it currently has
> problems with feedrates in circles, even in the V4 beta)- around a
> STANDARD TCNC install...
I started with V3.24c to be exact.
> Once your mods make it into the TCNC pkg (if they ever do), THEN theBTW: it isn't my doing that TCNC isn't updated with my mods. Powers
> argument(s) you've just laid out make sense for the "typical" guy...
> Having said all this, I do agree with some of your points. Ray Henry,
> I understand, taught himself programming so that he could do the same
> kinds of things with EMC that you have done with TCNC. And Art
> Fenerty is learning a LOT about what needs to be in a commercial
> level CNC control as he writes Mach2- he came from the programming
> side. So if the right person meets the right challenge...
>
> And I also agree that the timeframe for Doug's truth is diminishing.
> Hobby controls are getting a lot better, very quickly. Especially
> Mach2, IMO. TCNC, without your mods, IMO still has a long way to go.
>
> Right now, a guy who wants to machine, with 15k bux in hand, is
> better off with an older control he can use immediately. Unless YOU
> are going to update TCNC for his machine and HIS needs...
higher than me control whether or not this stuff makes it into the
public domain.
> Ballendo--
>
> P.S. I also agree with your statements about the value of
> having "done it" yourself, so you can fix it...
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Kim Lux <lux@d...> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 09:40, doug.rasmussen@c... wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Kim,
> > >
> > > First off, I didn't mean to suggest buying a machine that old, I
> was
> > > only making the statement that I feel the commercial controls of
> > > that age generally have more features than the current hobby PC
> > > based
> > > types.<snip>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Kim Lux <lux@...>
Discussion Thread
heliarc_bob
2003-12-15 22:28:45 UTC
Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 07:09:47 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 07:32:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Dale Emery
2003-12-16 08:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
heliarc_bob@y...
2003-12-16 08:33:36 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 08:40:37 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 09:30:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
whagaman@s...
2003-12-16 12:01:06 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 12:13:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Paul
2003-12-16 12:59:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 13:11:34 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
heliarc_bob@y...
2003-12-16 19:14:31 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
seb fontana
2003-12-16 20:10:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:28:34 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:30:35 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:30:59 UTC
Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 06:35:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
davemucha@j...
2003-12-17 06:37:00 UTC
Re: Software life cycles (was Bridgeport CNC retrofit
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 06:38:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 07:20:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby...
Matt Shaver
2003-12-17 07:37:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
jeff@w...
2003-12-17 08:03:53 UTC
Re: Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby...
dkowalcz@d...
2003-12-17 09:01:28 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 09:35:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
datac@l...
2003-12-17 10:32:42 UTC
Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 14:51:58 UTC
NIST 274NGC bugs was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport...
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 14:53:37 UTC
IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC...
Paul
2003-12-17 16:02:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NIST 274NGC bugs
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 17:06:21 UTC
Re: NIST 274NGC bugs
datac@l...
2003-12-17 20:14:53 UTC
IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC...
Dave Kowalczyk
2003-12-18 07:36:49 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-18 07:41:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...