CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...

Posted by Kim Lux
on 2003-12-17 06:35:47 UTC
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 03:01, ballendo@... wrote:
> Kim,
>
> Many great points. BUT...
>
> How many of them stand up without YOU in the equation???

I agree. However, even a stock TCNC package is pretty close to what
most stand alone controllers offer, even the old ones.


> In other words, how many people do you think could do the pascal
> programming you have done to make your version of TCNC? And of those
> who CAN program pascal, how many would have the time and inclination
> to help someone who knows machining, but NOT programming? (After all,
> you've just told us about two people who CAN'T get to where you are,
> or they wouldn't be asking you to set up their CNC...

Agreed.

> What this all leads to is that for most people, Doug is correct. An
> older commercial control (as he says, not necessarily 15 years old,
> when you have 15K bux to spend) will run circles-(and you know why
> I'm making that pun if you're familiar with TCNC-it currently has
> problems with feedrates in circles, even in the V4 beta)- around a
> STANDARD TCNC install...

V3 doesn't have these problems. I made my changed to V3, not V4 code.
I started with V3.24c to be exact.

> Once your mods make it into the TCNC pkg (if they ever do), THEN the
> argument(s) you've just laid out make sense for the "typical" guy...

> Having said all this, I do agree with some of your points. Ray Henry,
> I understand, taught himself programming so that he could do the same
> kinds of things with EMC that you have done with TCNC. And Art
> Fenerty is learning a LOT about what needs to be in a commercial
> level CNC control as he writes Mach2- he came from the programming
> side. So if the right person meets the right challenge...
>
> And I also agree that the timeframe for Doug's truth is diminishing.
> Hobby controls are getting a lot better, very quickly. Especially
> Mach2, IMO. TCNC, without your mods, IMO still has a long way to go.
>
> Right now, a guy who wants to machine, with 15k bux in hand, is
> better off with an older control he can use immediately. Unless YOU
> are going to update TCNC for his machine and HIS needs...

BTW: it isn't my doing that TCNC isn't updated with my mods. Powers
higher than me control whether or not this stuff makes it into the
public domain.

> Ballendo
>
> P.S. I also agree with your statements about the value of
> having "done it" yourself, so you can fix it...
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Kim Lux <lux@d...> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 09:40, doug.rasmussen@c... wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi Kim,
> > >
> > > First off, I didn't mean to suggest buying a machine that old, I
> was
> > > only making the statement that I feel the commercial controls of
> > > that age generally have more features than the current hobby PC
> > > based
> > > types.<snip>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
--
Kim Lux <lux@...>

Discussion Thread

heliarc_bob 2003-12-15 22:28:45 UTC Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. doug.rasmussen@c... 2003-12-16 07:09:47 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Kim Lux 2003-12-16 07:32:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Dale Emery 2003-12-16 08:17:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. heliarc_bob@y... 2003-12-16 08:33:36 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. doug.rasmussen@c... 2003-12-16 08:40:37 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Kim Lux 2003-12-16 09:30:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. whagaman@s... 2003-12-16 12:01:06 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Kim Lux 2003-12-16 12:13:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Paul 2003-12-16 12:59:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. doug.rasmussen@c... 2003-12-16 13:11:34 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. heliarc_bob@y... 2003-12-16 19:14:31 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. seb fontana 2003-12-16 20:10:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 06:28:34 UTC Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 06:30:35 UTC Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 06:30:59 UTC Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. Kim Lux 2003-12-17 06:35:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... davemucha@j... 2003-12-17 06:37:00 UTC Re: Software life cycles (was Bridgeport CNC retrofit Kim Lux 2003-12-17 06:38:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... Kim Lux 2003-12-17 07:20:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby... Matt Shaver 2003-12-17 07:37:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. jeff@w... 2003-12-17 08:03:53 UTC Re: Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby... dkowalcz@d... 2003-12-17 09:01:28 UTC Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... Kim Lux 2003-12-17 09:35:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... datac@l... 2003-12-17 10:32:42 UTC Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted. ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 14:51:58 UTC NIST 274NGC bugs was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport... ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 14:53:37 UTC IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC... Paul 2003-12-17 16:02:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NIST 274NGC bugs ballendo@y... 2003-12-17 17:06:21 UTC Re: NIST 274NGC bugs datac@l... 2003-12-17 20:14:53 UTC IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC... Dave Kowalczyk 2003-12-18 07:36:49 UTC Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec... Kim Lux 2003-12-18 07:41:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...