Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2003-12-17 06:30:35 UTC
Hello,
Yes, TCNC should be classified as "source available to registered
users". Apparently now, only for personal, private modifications...
Ballendo
P.S. Daves original release said you could use it however you
wanted, "even build a CNC empire if you like"... But now it says that
you can only use it for your own private mods.(this second "quote" is
paraphrased) Which left folks like me in the cold. Having spent a few
years re-working the developing code for commercial release to build
my CNC empire, Can I now use it? Or do I have to eliminate
the "parts" that come from later source code releases??? (I like the
GUTS, but hate the interface.) The new V4 is better, but still not
what I was hoping for, and not at all like what I had developed for
independent release, based on the old source doc. I'm not sure when
it changed. Good thing there's Mach2<G>.
Yes, TCNC should be classified as "source available to registered
users". Apparently now, only for personal, private modifications...
Ballendo
P.S. Daves original release said you could use it however you
wanted, "even build a CNC empire if you like"... But now it says that
you can only use it for your own private mods.(this second "quote" is
paraphrased) Which left folks like me in the cold. Having spent a few
years re-working the developing code for commercial release to build
my CNC empire, Can I now use it? Or do I have to eliminate
the "parts" that come from later source code releases??? (I like the
GUTS, but hate the interface.) The new V4 is better, but still not
what I was hoping for, and not at all like what I had developed for
independent release, based on the old source doc. I'm not sure when
it changed. Good thing there's Mach2<G>.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Paul <no.spam27@n...> wrote:
>
> Do NOT confuse this with true Open Source Software licensed under
one of the
> GNU FOSS licenses - See http://www.fsf.org/licenses/licenses.html
for the
> true definition.
>
> Regards, Paul.
>
>
> On Tuesday 16 December 2003 5:30 pm, Kim Lux wrote:
> > With open source code, you can modify it exactly like you want
it. If
> > I'm running a machine and something isn't nice to use, it goes on
a list
> > and gets modified. You wouldn't believe how much time these
> > modifications save in the long run.
>
> --
> irc channel for EMC users at irc.freenode.org
> /join #emc
> and chat to other users (not many there yet).
Discussion Thread
heliarc_bob
2003-12-15 22:28:45 UTC
Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 07:09:47 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 07:32:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Dale Emery
2003-12-16 08:17:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
heliarc_bob@y...
2003-12-16 08:33:36 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 08:40:37 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 09:30:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
whagaman@s...
2003-12-16 12:01:06 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-16 12:13:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Paul
2003-12-16 12:59:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
doug.rasmussen@c...
2003-12-16 13:11:34 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
heliarc_bob@y...
2003-12-16 19:14:31 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
seb fontana
2003-12-16 20:10:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:28:34 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:30:35 UTC
Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 06:30:59 UTC
Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 06:35:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
davemucha@j...
2003-12-17 06:37:00 UTC
Re: Software life cycles (was Bridgeport CNC retrofit
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 06:38:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 07:20:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby...
Matt Shaver
2003-12-17 07:37:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
jeff@w...
2003-12-17 08:03:53 UTC
Re: Dedicated versus PC controls... was Commer ver hobby...
dkowalcz@d...
2003-12-17 09:01:28 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-17 09:35:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
datac@l...
2003-12-17 10:32:42 UTC
Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit recommendations wanted.
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 14:51:58 UTC
NIST 274NGC bugs was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport...
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 14:53:37 UTC
IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC...
Paul
2003-12-17 16:02:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] NIST 274NGC bugs
ballendo@y...
2003-12-17 17:06:21 UTC
Re: NIST 274NGC bugs
datac@l...
2003-12-17 20:14:53 UTC
IndexerLPT vs. Mach2 was Flashcut and Mach2 was Re: Bridgeport CNC...
Dave Kowalczyk
2003-12-18 07:36:49 UTC
Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...
Kim Lux
2003-12-18 07:41:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Commercial vs. hobby controls was Re: Bridgeport CNC retrofit rec...