Re: CNC Controler Software
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2004-08-23 09:49:58 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jones, Joseph A1"
<joseph.a1.jones@l...> wrote:
That is to say, if I first machine a part using a CNC controller
running under windows with no signal generator, and then secondly
machine that same part using a CNC controller running under a RTOS or
using a real-time signal generator, what will be the difference in
the two parts?
time interval between each signal.
The difference is that the machine will pause and wait for the
software to send more signals. It is not just a variation in the
purity of a periodic waveform, but an actual interruption in the
sending of the signals. This will cause significant tooling marks in
a work piece, whether contouring in 2D or when 3D surface milling.
If you are working materials such as wood or plastic, the momentary
delays and hesitation may cause parts to be burned or melted as well
as marked by the cutter. If the delays are long enough, they could
even become a safety hazard as the machine suddenly takes off after
appearing to be paused.
Another much less expensive Windows option is the DeskCNC controller
($350). It includes both CAM programming software and a machine
controller on a card ( over 40,000 steps per second on 4 simultaneous
axes). It runs best in Windows 98 or later.
When comparing software controlled step systems with the external
hardware varieties, remember that you will probably need some kind of
a breakout board to actually attach your motor drivers to the
computer port. This function is handled by the external hardware.
Many people are now using step and direction controlled DC servo
systems. These are capable of much higher resolutions and rotational
speeds than stepper systems. When you use an encoder at these higher
rates, it is imperative that you have a clean, fast pulse stream, and
that you can output steps to match the enhanced resolutions available.
Fred Smith - IMService
Discounts and specials are at:
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby
<joseph.a1.jones@l...> wrote:
> Paul,stable pulse rates, but what I don't grasp is what is the result.
>
> I realize that a RTOS or dedicated signal generator can produce
That is to say, if I first machine a part using a CNC controller
running under windows with no signal generator, and then secondly
machine that same part using a CNC controller running under a RTOS or
using a real-time signal generator, what will be the difference in
the two parts?
>the exact same signals as the second part, just not with a consistant
> My initial thinking would be that the first part would be getting
time interval between each signal.
The difference is that the machine will pause and wait for the
software to send more signals. It is not just a variation in the
purity of a periodic waveform, but an actual interruption in the
sending of the signals. This will cause significant tooling marks in
a work piece, whether contouring in 2D or when 3D surface milling.
If you are working materials such as wood or plastic, the momentary
delays and hesitation may cause parts to be burned or melted as well
as marked by the cutter. If the delays are long enough, they could
even become a safety hazard as the machine suddenly takes off after
appearing to be paused.
Another much less expensive Windows option is the DeskCNC controller
($350). It includes both CAM programming software and a machine
controller on a card ( over 40,000 steps per second on 4 simultaneous
axes). It runs best in Windows 98 or later.
When comparing software controlled step systems with the external
hardware varieties, remember that you will probably need some kind of
a breakout board to actually attach your motor drivers to the
computer port. This function is handled by the external hardware.
Many people are now using step and direction controlled DC servo
systems. These are capable of much higher resolutions and rotational
speeds than stepper systems. When you use an encoder at these higher
rates, it is imperative that you have a clean, fast pulse stream, and
that you can output steps to match the enhanced resolutions available.
Fred Smith - IMService
Discounts and specials are at:
http://www.cadcamcadcam.com/hobby
Discussion Thread
archie5594
2004-08-23 05:03:46 UTC
CNC Controler Software
Paul
2004-08-23 06:00:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
Stan Aarhus
2004-08-23 06:44:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
Jones, Joseph A1
2004-08-23 07:07:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
Tony Jeffree
2004-08-23 07:29:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
caudlet
2004-08-23 09:35:40 UTC
Re: CNC Controler Software
Jon Elson
2004-08-23 09:37:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
Fred Smith
2004-08-23 09:49:58 UTC
Re: CNC Controler Software
Paul
2004-08-23 10:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Controler Software
Steven Ciciora
2004-08-23 11:49:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
Jones, Joseph A1
2004-08-23 12:21:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
Tom Hubin
2004-08-23 13:08:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
Jones, Joseph A1
2004-08-23 13:23:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
Dan Mauch
2004-08-23 13:51:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
cadman456
2004-08-23 17:35:19 UTC
Re: CNC Controller Software
james_cullins@s...
2004-08-23 19:07:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controller Software
volitan712003
2004-08-24 19:29:46 UTC
Re: CNC Controler Software
RH
2004-08-25 06:47:35 UTC
CNC - The Basics
Andy Wander
2004-08-25 07:04:25 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC - The Basics
Robert Campbell
2004-08-25 09:47:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC - The Basics
Jon Elson
2004-08-25 10:24:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controler Software
volitan712003
2004-08-29 05:45:56 UTC
Re: CNC Controler Software
Jon Elson
2004-08-29 21:46:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Controler Software