Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Tom Hubin wrote:
I lower the tool ontil it is almost touching the work. I then slip a piece
of paper that I know is .005" thick under the tool, and jog down until
the paper is pinched. I then right click on the Z axis and type .005
and hit the enter key. For X and Y, I use an edgefinder and jog over
until the edgefinder deflects to the side, then I stop the spindle (F9).
I right click on the axis, enter either .1 (the radius of the edgefinder)
or -.1, depending on which side of the part I'm on. Then, hit enter.
If I'm doing something that requires changing tools several times, I can
put the offsets for the different tool lengths in the tool table, and set up
the program to select the right tool offset with G43 H(tool #).
Jon
>I gave up on EMC and use TurboCnc primarily because I have found no wayMaybe I should describe how I set up my tools on simple workpieces.
>to reliably set the axis values from within a Gcode program.
>
>
I lower the tool ontil it is almost touching the work. I then slip a piece
of paper that I know is .005" thick under the tool, and jog down until
the paper is pinched. I then right click on the Z axis and type .005
and hit the enter key. For X and Y, I use an edgefinder and jog over
until the edgefinder deflects to the side, then I stop the spindle (F9).
I right click on the axis, enter either .1 (the radius of the edgefinder)
or -.1, depending on which side of the part I'm on. Then, hit enter.
If I'm doing something that requires changing tools several times, I can
put the offsets for the different tool lengths in the tool table, and set up
the program to select the right tool offset with G43 H(tool #).
Jon
Discussion Thread
ednass01
2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC
emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ednass01
2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC
Re: emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
R Rogers
2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ballendo
2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
Re: emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92