Re: emc g92
Posted by
ballendo
on 2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
G06 is usually parabolic interpolation...
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Alan Marconett <KM6VV@a...>
wrote:
Hope this helps,
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Alan Marconett <KM6VV@a...>
wrote:
> Hi Jon,(G92
>
> Thanks for the clarifications!
>
> Was it that EMC doesn't like stopping and re-starting the program
> in-between)?G92 for
>
> I was thinking G06 would be nice because it reads a switch before
> continuing the program.
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>
> Jon Elson wrote:
>
> > Alan Marconett wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Tom,
> >>
> >>Are you running The Sherline version of EMC? I simply MUST have
> >>touching off in X and Y, and also the tool length in Z. I'mcurrently
> >>using my STEP4 controller, not EMC. I want to run Sherline'sEMC, as
> >>soon as I get it's machine running again!program, I do
> >>
> >>I use G92 as Jon suggests to set X,Y and Z, but not IN the
> >>it manually with MDI. Does EMI tolerate this?you can also
> >>
> >
> > Yes, of course. You can enter any valid command by MDI. But,
> > do it on screen with just a couple of mouse clicks andkeystrokes. Much
> > fasterend of
> > than MDI. The later versions of EMC clear the G92 offset at the
> > the program. But, the end of program does NOT clear the offsetentered
> > through the mouse right click.take it
> >
> >
> >> I don't currently do
> >>tool changes in the program, I just make separate programs. I
> >>you're using G92 to set Z 0.005 or whatever after the M06? Humm,maybe
> >>I can incorporate something like that. Do you have a code snip?the G43
> >>
> >>
> >
> > M06 really has no meaning unless you have a tool changer. It is
> > command
> > that selects tool length offsets.
> >
> > Jon
> >
Discussion Thread
ednass01
2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC
emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ednass01
2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC
Re: emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
R Rogers
2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ballendo
2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
Re: emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92