CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: emc g92

Posted by ballendo
on 2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
G06 is usually parabolic interpolation...

Hope this helps,

Ballendo

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Alan Marconett <KM6VV@a...>
wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Thanks for the clarifications!
>
> Was it that EMC doesn't like stopping and re-starting the program
(G92
> in-between)?
>
> I was thinking G06 would be nice because it reads a switch before
> continuing the program.
>
> Alan KM6VV
>
>
> Jon Elson wrote:
>
> > Alan Marconett wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Tom,
> >>
> >>Are you running The Sherline version of EMC? I simply MUST have
G92 for
> >>touching off in X and Y, and also the tool length in Z. I'm
currently
> >>using my STEP4 controller, not EMC. I want to run Sherline's
EMC, as
> >>soon as I get it's machine running again!
> >>
> >>I use G92 as Jon suggests to set X,Y and Z, but not IN the
program, I do
> >>it manually with MDI. Does EMI tolerate this?
> >>
> >
> > Yes, of course. You can enter any valid command by MDI. But,
you can also
> > do it on screen with just a couple of mouse clicks and
keystrokes. Much
> > faster
> > than MDI. The later versions of EMC clear the G92 offset at the
end of
> > the program. But, the end of program does NOT clear the offset
entered
> > through the mouse right click.
> >
> >
> >> I don't currently do
> >>tool changes in the program, I just make separate programs. I
take it
> >>you're using G92 to set Z 0.005 or whatever after the M06? Humm,
maybe
> >>I can incorporate something like that. Do you have a code snip?
> >>
> >>
> >
> > M06 really has no meaning unless you have a tool changer. It is
the G43
> > command
> > that selects tool length offsets.
> >
> > Jon
> >

Discussion Thread

ednass01 2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 ednass01 2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC Re: emc g92 Tom Hubin 2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 R Rogers 2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Tom Hubin 2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Alan Marconett 2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Geert De Pecker 2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Alan Marconett 2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Tom Hubin 2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Tom Hubin 2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 ballendo 2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC Re: emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Geert De Pecker 2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Alan Marconett 2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Alan Marconett 2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 John Dammeyer 2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 John Dammeyer 2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92 Jon Elson 2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92