Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Alan Marconett wrote:
meaningless. G43 activates tool length compensation based on the tool
number
supplied in the H word following it, as in G42 H5 selects the length
offset of
tool #5 in the tool table. Similarly, G41 and G42 select a cutter
radius compensation
value from the tool table, where the D word specifies the tool number.
As in
G41 D3 selects the radius compensation for tool 3 from the tool table.
The S key reSumes after a Pause. (R was already taken, as Run.)
Jon
>HI Jon,M06 is tool change, but if you don't have a tool changer, the command is
>
>Well that sounds like a proper if not a little cumbersome way to start
>up, although I guess one could wish for a "restart" key. As long as one
>can start the program up where it left off.
>
>I was thinking of M06, not a 'G'. ;>) tool change. Is that the 'S' key?
>
>
meaningless. G43 activates tool length compensation based on the tool
number
supplied in the H word following it, as in G42 H5 selects the length
offset of
tool #5 in the tool table. Similarly, G41 and G42 select a cutter
radius compensation
value from the tool table, where the D word specifies the tool number.
As in
G41 D3 selects the radius compensation for tool 3 from the tool table.
The S key reSumes after a Pause. (R was already taken, as Run.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
ednass01
2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC
emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ednass01
2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC
Re: emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
R Rogers
2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ballendo
2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
Re: emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92