RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Posted by
John Dammeyer
on 2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
Thanks Jon,
Good link. But I didn't see anything in those programs for
stopping EMC, moving the work out of the way to change a tool
bit, and then moving the work back.
Or for EMC based systems is it better to make each a separate
program? Ie. When first operation is complete. (in my example
the first slot) move to home position and stop. Then Operator
can install new tool bit into existing mill holder and start the
new program?
But how under EMC does the operator tell the system where the 0
point is for the new tool bit?
Thanks,
John
Good link. But I didn't see anything in those programs for
stopping EMC, moving the work out of the way to change a tool
bit, and then moving the work back.
Or for EMC based systems is it better to make each a separate
program? Ie. When first operation is complete. (in my example
the first slot) move to home position and stop. Then Operator
can install new tool bit into existing mill holder and start the
new program?
But how under EMC does the operator tell the system where the 0
point is for the new tool bit?
Thanks,
John
> Both programs will rough the hole or pocket in depth steps,G-codes.)
> and then finish to the final ID. See
> http://jelinux.pico-systems.com/gcode.html where you can
> download c source or DOS executables of these and other
> programs. (They are tested on EMC, but should work on most
> CNC programs, as they use the lowest common denominator of
>
> Jon
>
Discussion Thread
ednass01
2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC
emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ednass01
2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC
Re: emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
R Rogers
2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ballendo
2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
Re: emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92