Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Posted by
Alan Marconett
on 2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
HI Jon,
Well that sounds like a proper if not a little cumbersome way to start
up, although I guess one could wish for a "restart" key. As long as one
can start the program up where it left off.
I was thinking of M06, not a 'G'. ;>) tool change. Is that the 'S' key?
Alan KM6VV
Jon Elson wrote:
Well that sounds like a proper if not a little cumbersome way to start
up, although I guess one could wish for a "restart" key. As long as one
can start the program up where it left off.
I was thinking of M06, not a 'G'. ;>) tool change. Is that the 'S' key?
Alan KM6VV
Jon Elson wrote:
> Alan Marconett wrote:
>
>
>>Hi Jon,
>>
>>Thanks for the clarifications!
>>
>>Was it that EMC doesn't like stopping and re-starting the program (G92
>>in-between)?
>>
>>
>
> Hmm? I'm not clear what you are asking, here. EMC requires a pretty
> cumbersome procedure of opening an editor window and scanning for
> the line you want to restart at, and clicking the "set run mark" button.
> EMC then scans the entire G-code program from the beginning, to be sure
> it is in the right "mode" and at the right location before starting at that
> point. This can take quite a while. But, it DOES have the plus that
> you won't
> be staring at a cryptic error message for 30 minutes when you try to
> back up and restart in the middle of a circular interpolation with cutter
> compensation turned on, wheile the interpreter is in linear without
> compensation.
>
>
>>I was thinking G06 would be nice because it reads a switch before
>>continuing the program.
>>
>>
>
> Well, you can put a switch across the "S" key to resume after a pause.
>
> I would like for EMC to have more flexible control of the part program,
> but I understand the reasons that it doesn't.
>
> Jon
>
Discussion Thread
ednass01
2004-10-16 22:03:08 UTC
emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-16 23:30:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ednass01
2004-10-17 04:34:14 UTC
Re: emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 16:04:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:46:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 17:54:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
R Rogers
2004-10-17 18:28:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-17 21:56:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-17 23:04:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 10:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-18 11:39:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 18:44:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-18 19:06:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Tom Hubin
2004-10-18 21:04:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
ballendo
2004-10-18 21:36:42 UTC
Re: emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-18 23:26:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Geert De Pecker
2004-10-19 13:52:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:18:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Alan Marconett
2004-10-19 14:26:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 18:04:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-19 21:05:55 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-19 22:43:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
John Dammeyer
2004-10-20 09:55:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92
Jon Elson
2004-10-20 19:31:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] emc g92