CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design

Posted by engravingdave
on 2006-07-24 02:33:58 UTC
Bordering on OT but an interesting discussion.

Machines now are certainly capabable of replicating themselves. I
would be far more interested in a machine that could make itself
functionally more superior :)

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dennis Schmitz"
<denschmitz@...> wrote:
>
> A couple of years back, I saw a project being done out of a
university
> that was a first attempt at a self-replicating robot. The idea was
> that it would use various plastics and metals to create circuits
and
> other parts. The idea was far to ambitious to succeed today, but it
> got me thinking.
>
> A first step toward such a thing, and indeed toward a completely
self
> replicating factory might be a machine tool that would ship with
> complete plans to make all of the parts of itself. Sure, this ruins
> the business models of a company that might want to sell them, but
> that's not the point, rather the point is, is it feasible?
>
> A complete machine would need lots of electronics and proprietary
CAD
> software to build, but that can all be bought off-the-shelf,
making it
> conceivable that once you have a machine, you can make more of them
> with it.
>
> Sticking with mechanical stuff (because manufacturing multilayer
PWBs
> is still difficult), what would such a machine look like? How many
of
> the parts could be made with milling and lathe operations? Is free
> motion control software mature enough? What CAD formats should be
> used? How can we reduce the number of different materials required?
> Could enough people get interested in it to create a
> electro-mechanical equivalent of open-source software?
>
> I'm just interested in your thoughts about what it would take to
build
> a basic machine assuming you can buy some stuff like motors and
screws
> and single-board computers.
>
> What about licensing? Would people put up with software that
> occasionally insisted on building a spare part?
>
> Imagine 20 or 100 years out, could this base design evolve into
> something truly automatic, say garage sized, that had the
capability
> to create everything necessary to make itself, including
> semiconductors. Assuming it could create all kinds of other stuff,
> from watches to cars, how would this change the world? Do we really
> want to give every tinkerer or psychotic teenager the ability to
build
> a fighter jet or nuke from scratch?
>
> What should it be called? (I'm partial to simple names
like "Factory v0.001")
>
> Sorry if my random Sunday daydreams bore you -- feel free to
ignore.
>

Discussion Thread

Dennis Schmitz 2006-07-23 12:06:51 UTC Soliciting Feedback: OS Design BRIAN FOLEY 2006-07-23 14:40:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Mariss Freimanis 2006-07-24 02:32:08 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design engravingdave 2006-07-24 02:33:58 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Pete Brown (YahooGroups) 2006-07-24 04:56:24 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Doug M 2006-07-24 07:28:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design wanliker@a... 2006-07-24 09:55:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Dennis Schmitz 2006-07-24 11:42:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design R Rogers 2006-07-24 12:28:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Doug M 2006-07-24 12:43:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Graham Stabler 2006-07-24 13:41:34 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Dennis Schmitz 2006-07-24 23:02:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Graham Stabler 2006-07-25 01:27:36 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design ballendo 2006-07-25 04:03:20 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS ballendo 2006-07-25 04:17:11 UTC Swiss NC anc CNC was Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design ballendo 2006-07-25 04:26:43 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design Graham Stabler 2006-07-25 05:13:33 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS Graham Stabler 2006-07-25 05:16:02 UTC Swiss NC anc CNC was Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design pml58@s... 2006-07-25 06:14:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design lcdpublishing 2006-07-25 06:26:28 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design R Rogers 2006-07-25 10:26:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS ballendo 2006-07-25 13:09:09 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS ballendo 2006-07-25 13:33:48 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS Dennis Schmitz 2006-07-25 13:53:22 UTC Soliciting Feedback: OS Design lcdpublishing 2006-07-25 14:27:35 UTC Re: Soliciting Feedback: OS Design R Rogers 2006-07-25 14:42:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS R Rogers 2006-07-25 14:46:35 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS lcdpublishing 2006-07-25 14:54:34 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS ballendo 2006-07-25 17:43:02 UTC replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS