replication, or big machines from small ones was Re: Soliciting Feedback:OS

LOL! I think he was saying his wood chuck could replicate itself
(or some of it's parts). But, as history demonstrates, it will
take "Two weeks" to do it.

Sorry, couldn't resist.

Chris


--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, R Rogers <rogersmach@...>
wrote:

>
> Ballendo,
>
> Thanks for correcting me. I appreciate your vast knowledge of

all things mechanical. I am in the market for another Bridgeport.
After much convincing by you, I'll just whip out another one on the
Bridgeports I have. What was I thinking?

>
> Thanks again, Ron
>
> ballendo <ballendo@...> wrote:
> >In CCED, "Graham Stabler" <eexgs@> wrote:
>
> >>B wrote: then you'll hand scrape the ways to complete the task

(as was

> >>done on the original!)
>
> >Hand scraping is a seperate operation not done on the mill so

strictly

> >its not allowed.
> >
> >A lot of the other things you are talking about need tooling that
> >itself also needs to be made and may need further tooling, I can
> >certainly see where Marris was coming from.
>
> Graham,
>
> Yes, I agree with Mariss. My reply was aimed at Ron's blanket
> statements about what machines can and cannot do. Not so much

about

> Dennis's original "OS" idea, which is partly why I changed the

subject

> line...
>
> Ballendo
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>