RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Posted by
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
on 2006-07-24 04:49:45 UTC
If you have RhinoCAM, you don't need Visual Mill (and vice versa). They both
do the same things. Which one you pick will depend on what your planned
usage is. RhinoCAM is 4axis Visual Mill inside Rhino.
RhinoCAM Pro lists at $3999 (I got mine for around $2K during the intro, I'm
not sure what it goes for now). The Pro version has just about everything.
Rhino lists at $895 (most places sell it for quite a bit less than that)
So you're still probably talking about $4000 or so. If you can get
SolidWorks for near that, and want to go that route, I'd say to just go that
route. If you can't justify 2x the cost, though (training and competency
building aside), that $4k will get you pretty far.
Does SolidWorks include CAM for the $8854 price?
Pete
_____________________________________________________
Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis)
Visit my personal site : http://www.irritatedVowel.com
(wallpaper, western maryland ry, .net, photography, model rr)
_____
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of gawnca
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 7:42 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
For the three programs you listed, Rhino 3.0, RhinoCAM, and
VisualMill, you may as well buy SolidWorks. Those three add up to
$8,854, about $850 more than SW.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_ <mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com>
DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\)"
<YahooLists@...> wrote:
do the same things. Which one you pick will depend on what your planned
usage is. RhinoCAM is 4axis Visual Mill inside Rhino.
RhinoCAM Pro lists at $3999 (I got mine for around $2K during the intro, I'm
not sure what it goes for now). The Pro version has just about everything.
Rhino lists at $895 (most places sell it for quite a bit less than that)
So you're still probably talking about $4000 or so. If you can get
SolidWorks for near that, and want to go that route, I'd say to just go that
route. If you can't justify 2x the cost, though (training and competency
building aside), that $4k will get you pretty far.
Does SolidWorks include CAM for the $8854 price?
Pete
_____________________________________________________
Pete Brown - Gambrills, MD (Near Annapolis)
Visit my personal site : http://www.irritatedVowel.com
(wallpaper, western maryland ry, .net, photography, model rr)
_____
From: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of gawnca
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 7:42 PM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
For the three programs you listed, Rhino 3.0, RhinoCAM, and
VisualMill, you may as well buy SolidWorks. Those three add up to
$8,854, about $850 more than SW.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_ <mailto:CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO%40yahoogroups.com>
DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Pete Brown \(YahooGroups\)"
<YahooLists@...> wrote:
>head). Rhino
> If you don't need the parametric capabilities of solidworks, I recommend
> Rhino. Rhino is used a lot in industrial design, and costs well under a
> thousand US (anywhere from 600 to 800 or so, off the top of my
> is actively updated (Version 4 has had several betas while Version 3price fool
> continues to be enhanced), and actively supported. Don't let the
> you, it is a serious modeling tool.RhinoCAM Pro
>
>
>
> You can also get a Visual Mill plug-in called RhinoCAM that seamlessly
> integrates the modeling and CAM workflows. I have the 4 axis
> product.<http://www.rhino3d.com/> com/>
>
>
>
> http://www.Rhino3d <http://www.Rhino3d.com> com <http://www.rhino3d
><http://www.rhinocam.com/> .com/>
>
>
> http://www.RhinoCAM <http://www.RhinoCAM.com> .com <http://www.rhinocam
>com/Mec/Gallery/other.html
> Gallery of things made using the MecSoft CAM products:
>
> http://www.mecsoft <http://www.mecsoft.com/Mec/Gallery/other.html>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Pete
Discussion Thread
Joe
2006-07-12 20:17:46 UTC
CAD packages
Jarrett & Heidi Johnson
2006-07-12 20:32:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
hannu venermo
2006-07-13 04:35:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
Ryan Johnson
2006-07-13 05:10:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
WT
2006-07-13 06:02:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2006-07-13 16:12:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
mikehenryil
2006-07-13 18:59:34 UTC
Re: CAD packages
Harko Schwartz
2006-07-14 05:53:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAD packages
Luke1027
2006-07-14 07:49:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Luke1027
2006-07-14 08:52:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Seiman H
2006-07-23 07:44:57 UTC
Speed reducer or GEAR BOX FOR NEMA23, 34
gawnca
2006-07-23 14:17:43 UTC
Re: CAD packages
gawnca
2006-07-23 17:59:46 UTC
Re: CAD packages
mechatronics international
2006-07-24 02:03:36 UTC
CAD packages
Graham Stabler
2006-07-24 04:14:12 UTC
Re: CAD packages
Pete Brown (YahooGroups)
2006-07-24 04:49:45 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Ryan Johnson
2006-07-24 06:06:40 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Robert Colin Campbell
2006-07-24 06:41:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAD packages
Les Newell
2006-07-24 06:54:35 UTC
Force feedback handwheels
Paul Kelly
2006-07-24 07:06:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Force feedback handwheels
turbulatordude
2006-07-24 07:55:44 UTC
Re: Force feedback handwheels
lcdpublishing
2006-07-24 08:23:01 UTC
Re: Force feedback handwheels
Les Newell
2006-07-24 10:38:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Force feedback handwheels
Les Newell
2006-07-24 10:52:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Force feedback handwheels
Dennis Schmitz
2006-07-24 11:47:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Force feedback handwheels
Graham Stabler
2006-07-24 13:38:37 UTC
Re: Force feedback handwheels
Graham Stabler
2006-07-24 13:38:37 UTC
Re: CAD packages