Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Posted by
lcdpublishing
on 2006-12-18 12:53:38 UTC
AHHHHH, Thanks Les. That is making sense. So, what you are saying
then if I understand correctly, is that the staircase effect of the
range of frequencies is limitted in both "Systems". But with a
45Khz system, you have say a total of 1024 discrete different
frequencies you can work with - most of them being in the lower
range - leaving large steps in the higher frequencies. Applying the
same to these new devices, you have a broader range of discrete
frequencies within that 4Mhz range? Again, having the higher
resolution of frequencies within the lower useable range.
If that's the case, that makes good sense. I have run into this
problem working with micros too for various velocity control
issues.
Thanks!!!
Chris
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Leslie Newell
<lesnewell@...> wrote:
then if I understand correctly, is that the staircase effect of the
range of frequencies is limitted in both "Systems". But with a
45Khz system, you have say a total of 1024 discrete different
frequencies you can work with - most of them being in the lower
range - leaving large steps in the higher frequencies. Applying the
same to these new devices, you have a broader range of discrete
frequencies within that 4Mhz range? Again, having the higher
resolution of frequencies within the lower useable range.
If that's the case, that makes good sense. I have run into this
problem working with micros too for various velocity control
issues.
Thanks!!!
Chris
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Leslie Newell
<lesnewell@...> wrote:
>running at
> Hi Chris,
>
> One reason for high step rates is harmonic purity. Take Mach3
> 45kHz. There are a limited range of frequencies it can produce:pulses
> 45kHz
> 45kHz/2 = 22.5kHz
> 45kHz/3 = 15kHz
> 45kHz/4 = 11.25kHz
> and so on
>
> Now what happens if you need 30kHz? Mach will produce a burst of
> at 22.5kHz then a burst of pulses at 45kHz then back to 22.5 andso on.
> The average will be 30kHz. Your poor stepper motor is trying torapidly
> switch between two speeds. Of course inertia means there is nochance of
> it accurately following the rapidly changing signal. What happensin
> practice is that a lot of torque is wasted trying to track theseanyway
> variations. If you are running close to the motor's max torque
> you will end up losing steps. The really evil thing about thisproblem
> is that you cannot predict it. You can set up your machine so itruns
> great until one day you feed at just the wrong speed and the motorloses
> steps.4MHz. The
>
> Now try the same thing with a pulse generator that can produce
> two frequencies are 30.075kHz and 29.851kHz. This variation is sotiny
> that it will have virtually no effect on the motor.affect
>
> Servos are much less affected by this problem but it will still
> performance at higher speeds.generated
>
> As well as the above problem, Mach has to contend with delays
> by PC hardware. These delays cause the pulse train to be even moreragged.
>thought
> Les
>
>
> lcdpublishing wrote:
> >
> > Both of the devices, the GREX and the ARC100 promote some very
> > intresting features and performance specs. At first glance I
> > I might be able to utilize these features but after looking atthe
> > numbers a bit more closely, I couldn't see a practicalapplication for
> > hobby use. So, that got me thinking about commercialapplications
> > and, well, I just couldn't think of one so I had to ask.are a
> >
> > I know from the posts by people in the various groups that there
> > number of these units out there. What is it that they arebuilding
> > that utilizes such amazing performance?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
>
Discussion Thread
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 07:09:10 UTC
Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-12-18 08:30:26 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
turbulatordude
2006-12-18 09:00:14 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 09:13:32 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
turbulatordude
2006-12-18 10:14:19 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
caudlet
2006-12-18 10:31:11 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 11:06:01 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Mariss Freimanis
2006-12-18 11:20:22 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 11:45:42 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Fred Smith
2006-12-18 11:45:55 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
C.S. Mo
2006-12-18 12:14:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
atelierrobin
2006-12-18 12:22:02 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 12:32:27 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Leslie Newell
2006-12-18 12:39:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 12:41:58 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 12:53:38 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
atelierrobin
2006-12-18 12:58:12 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Mark Vaughan
2006-12-18 13:05:57 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 13:08:38 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
John Dammeyer
2006-12-18 14:20:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Tony Smith
2006-12-18 14:25:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-18 14:33:30 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Leslie Newell
2006-12-18 14:46:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Leslie Newell
2006-12-18 14:48:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Fred Smith
2006-12-18 15:01:55 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
John Dammeyer
2006-12-18 15:16:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Jon Elson
2006-12-18 20:47:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Jon Elson
2006-12-18 20:47:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
turbulatordude
2006-12-19 04:58:10 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-19 05:15:37 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-19 05:29:33 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Jon Elson
2006-12-19 07:59:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Graham Stabler
2006-12-19 08:38:12 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
lcdpublishing
2006-12-19 08:56:42 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Graham Stabler
2006-12-19 09:46:05 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
optics22000
2006-12-19 10:27:16 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
John Dammeyer
2006-12-19 11:04:49 UTC
CNCing a 7x12 minilathe
Graham Stabler
2006-12-19 12:06:19 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?
Peter Homann
2006-12-19 12:12:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing a 7x12 minilathe
John Dammeyer
2006-12-19 12:47:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing a 7x12 minilathe
David Bloomfield
2006-12-20 04:09:10 UTC
Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?