CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?

Posted by lcdpublishing
on 2006-12-18 12:53:38 UTC
AHHHHH, Thanks Les. That is making sense. So, what you are saying
then if I understand correctly, is that the staircase effect of the
range of frequencies is limitted in both "Systems". But with a
45Khz system, you have say a total of 1024 discrete different
frequencies you can work with - most of them being in the lower
range - leaving large steps in the higher frequencies. Applying the
same to these new devices, you have a broader range of discrete
frequencies within that 4Mhz range? Again, having the higher
resolution of frequencies within the lower useable range.

If that's the case, that makes good sense. I have run into this
problem working with micros too for various velocity control
issues.

Thanks!!!

Chris





--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Leslie Newell
<lesnewell@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> One reason for high step rates is harmonic purity. Take Mach3
running at
> 45kHz. There are a limited range of frequencies it can produce:
> 45kHz
> 45kHz/2 = 22.5kHz
> 45kHz/3 = 15kHz
> 45kHz/4 = 11.25kHz
> and so on
>
> Now what happens if you need 30kHz? Mach will produce a burst of
pulses
> at 22.5kHz then a burst of pulses at 45kHz then back to 22.5 and
so on.
> The average will be 30kHz. Your poor stepper motor is trying to
rapidly
> switch between two speeds. Of course inertia means there is no
chance of
> it accurately following the rapidly changing signal. What happens
in
> practice is that a lot of torque is wasted trying to track these
> variations. If you are running close to the motor's max torque
anyway
> you will end up losing steps. The really evil thing about this
problem
> is that you cannot predict it. You can set up your machine so it
runs
> great until one day you feed at just the wrong speed and the motor
loses
> steps.
>
> Now try the same thing with a pulse generator that can produce
4MHz. The
> two frequencies are 30.075kHz and 29.851kHz. This variation is so
tiny
> that it will have virtually no effect on the motor.
>
> Servos are much less affected by this problem but it will still
affect
> performance at higher speeds.
>
> As well as the above problem, Mach has to contend with delays
generated
> by PC hardware. These delays cause the pulse train to be even more
ragged.
>
> Les
>
>
> lcdpublishing wrote:
> >
> > Both of the devices, the GREX and the ARC100 promote some very
> > intresting features and performance specs. At first glance I
thought
> > I might be able to utilize these features but after looking at
the
> > numbers a bit more closely, I couldn't see a practical
application for
> > hobby use. So, that got me thinking about commercial
applications
> > and, well, I just couldn't think of one so I had to ask.
> >
> > I know from the posts by people in the various groups that there
are a
> > number of these units out there. What is it that they are
building
> > that utilizes such amazing performance?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> >
>

Discussion Thread

lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 07:09:10 UTC Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Mariss Freimanis 2006-12-18 08:30:26 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? turbulatordude 2006-12-18 09:00:14 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 09:13:32 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? turbulatordude 2006-12-18 10:14:19 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? caudlet 2006-12-18 10:31:11 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 11:06:01 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Mariss Freimanis 2006-12-18 11:20:22 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 11:45:42 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Fred Smith 2006-12-18 11:45:55 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? C.S. Mo 2006-12-18 12:14:34 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? atelierrobin 2006-12-18 12:22:02 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 12:32:27 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Leslie Newell 2006-12-18 12:39:43 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 12:41:58 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 12:53:38 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? atelierrobin 2006-12-18 12:58:12 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Mark Vaughan 2006-12-18 13:05:57 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 13:08:38 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? John Dammeyer 2006-12-18 14:20:46 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Tony Smith 2006-12-18 14:25:18 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-18 14:33:30 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Leslie Newell 2006-12-18 14:46:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Leslie Newell 2006-12-18 14:48:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Fred Smith 2006-12-18 15:01:55 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? John Dammeyer 2006-12-18 15:16:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Jon Elson 2006-12-18 20:47:23 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Jon Elson 2006-12-18 20:47:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? turbulatordude 2006-12-19 04:58:10 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-19 05:15:37 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-19 05:29:33 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Jon Elson 2006-12-19 07:59:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Graham Stabler 2006-12-19 08:38:12 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? lcdpublishing 2006-12-19 08:56:42 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Graham Stabler 2006-12-19 09:46:05 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? optics22000 2006-12-19 10:27:16 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? John Dammeyer 2006-12-19 11:04:49 UTC CNCing a 7x12 minilathe Graham Stabler 2006-12-19 12:06:19 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)? Peter Homann 2006-12-19 12:12:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing a 7x12 minilathe John Dammeyer 2006-12-19 12:47:34 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNCing a 7x12 minilathe David Bloomfield 2006-12-20 04:09:10 UTC Re: Why is the push to such high step rates (Grex and Arc100)?