Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Posted by
hannu
on 2007-04-25 13:45:41 UTC
the rohs is importer and distributor (end-user) responsibility, i.e. mine.
and it does not apply to cnc mills, et al, which by their very
definition are fixed
machinery, exempt from rohs.
i agree its silly in many ways ;)
as they allow lead-acid batteries in cars but not lead solder.
the new lead-free solder is a much poorer substitute,
and the cars contaminate at least 100x all solder together.
but im still stuck without any resonable druver solution for slow speed,
under 30-50v drives.
for cnc saws i cant justify (2-3) geckos ... and the needed speed is
only about 2-4 rps.
xylotex are well known as good, reliable and well-supported, so im stuck
between the rock and the hard place.
the chinese imports cost more, and i have no expectacion of any kind of
proper tech support.
oh well ... still looking ...
jeffalanp wrote:
and it does not apply to cnc mills, et al, which by their very
definition are fixed
machinery, exempt from rohs.
i agree its silly in many ways ;)
as they allow lead-acid batteries in cars but not lead solder.
the new lead-free solder is a much poorer substitute,
and the cars contaminate at least 100x all solder together.
but im still stuck without any resonable druver solution for slow speed,
under 30-50v drives.
for cnc saws i cant justify (2-3) geckos ... and the needed speed is
only about 2-4 rps.
xylotex are well known as good, reliable and well-supported, so im stuck
between the rock and the hard place.
the chinese imports cost more, and i have no expectacion of any kind of
proper tech support.
oh well ... still looking ...
jeffalanp wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Xylotex products contain lead (Pb) based solder which is a
> restricted substance in the EU. Because of the lead, Xylotex
> products are not RoHS compliant, and are restricted from being
> imported in to the EU.
>
> Not so wierd after all. The RoHS restriction is what is wierd.
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
Tom Kulaga
1999-05-09 16:02:28 UTC
Introduction
David Johnson
1999-07-03 11:16:28 UTC
Introduction
Hugh Prescott
1999-07-03 12:06:56 UTC
Re: Introduction
Mo
1999-07-03 16:52:25 UTC
Re: Introduction
Jon Elson
1999-07-03 23:18:54 UTC
Re: Introduction
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-06 22:18:19 UTC
Introduction
funluva22
2007-04-24 16:32:25 UTC
Introduction
hannu
2007-04-25 02:09:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: microstepping drivers
jeffalanp
2007-04-25 12:48:51 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
hannu
2007-04-25 13:45:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
caudlet
2007-04-25 13:57:50 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
JanRwl@A...
2007-04-25 14:04:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Wayne Weedon
2007-04-25 14:09:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Wayne Weedon
2007-04-25 14:11:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Mark Vaughan
2007-04-25 14:37:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Mark Vaughan
2007-04-25 14:57:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
caudlet
2007-04-25 18:05:32 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
David G. LeVine
2007-04-25 19:55:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Mark Vaughan
2007-04-26 00:08:12 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Lester Caine
2007-04-26 02:58:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
Mark Vaughan
2007-04-26 05:42:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers
funluva22
2007-04-27 14:55:09 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
ballendo
2007-04-28 22:57:47 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
ballendo
2007-04-28 23:05:54 UTC
Re: microstepping drivers
Mark Vaughan
2007-04-29 01:13:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: microstepping drivers