Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
Posted by
Alison & Jim Gregg
on 2000-10-11 19:06:22 UTC
Annie and list.
I concurr re thickness - about 0.030" is the sensible limit even for double
sided etching.
One of the unsung problems of this process is the "Nanny State" - I quoted
and designed a system part on the assumption of using KPR (Kodak Photo
Resist) for the resist, using negatives derived from a laser printer
transparency, and then found that KPR and its developers were banned in
Australia several years ago as cancer producing. Most of the available
substitutes did not come within cooee of the KPR performance.
Jim Gregg.
At 02:44 PM 10/11/00 -0700, you wrote:
I concurr re thickness - about 0.030" is the sensible limit even for double
sided etching.
One of the unsung problems of this process is the "Nanny State" - I quoted
and designed a system part on the assumption of using KPR (Kodak Photo
Resist) for the resist, using negatives derived from a laser printer
transparency, and then found that KPR and its developers were banned in
Australia several years ago as cancer producing. Most of the available
substitutes did not come within cooee of the KPR performance.
Jim Gregg.
At 02:44 PM 10/11/00 -0700, you wrote:
>Join the ModelersCAD list on egroups. They have this down to a fine routine.bronze,
>
>Among model RR'ers it's routine to see things like expanded metal created
>in 1:87 size. I'm working on a railroad station model, the real one has
>"security bars" on the windows. I'll make them by photoetch.
>
>I'll send it out to be etched, as the chemicals are messy and I'm no expert
>at the process, but it's a routine.
>
>Most common material is half hard shim brass, but nickel silver, phosphor
> and stainless steel are very common too.etch fine.
>
>0.050 is pushing your luck on thickness, I'd CNC that. But for 0.020 it'll
>The problem is that the parts tend to undercut as they get thicker.
>
>Annie
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-10-11 07:49:10 UTC
2D printer-real parts
Ian Wright
2000-10-11 09:18:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
dave engvall
2000-10-11 09:57:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-10-11 10:00:07 UTC
Re: 2D printer-real parts
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-10-11 10:47:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-10-11 11:08:11 UTC
Re: 2D printer-real parts
Joe Vicars
2000-10-11 11:38:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts
Jon Elson
2000-10-11 14:43:28 UTC
Re: 2D printer-real parts
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-11 14:49:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-11 15:04:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-10-11 17:37:55 UTC
What about QNX?
Alison & Jim Gregg
2000-10-11 19:06:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-10-11 20:46:39 UTC
Re: 2D printer-real parts
ballendo@y...
2000-10-11 23:52:16 UTC
re:What about QNX?
Jon Elson
2000-10-11 23:56:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] 2D printer-real parts
ballendo@y...
2000-10-12 00:21:33 UTC
re:Re: 2D printer-real parts
Alison & Jim Gregg
2000-10-12 01:33:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: 2D printer-real parts
Ian Wright
2000-10-12 01:34:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts
Kevin P. Martin
2000-10-12 08:10:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] What about QNX?
Drew Rogge
2000-10-12 15:18:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts
Art Fenerty
2000-10-12 15:20:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts
JanRwl@A...
2000-10-13 18:55:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: 2D printer-real parts