Re: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Posted by
Matt Shaver
on 1999-07-15 08:37:35 UTC
> From: Tom Kulaga <tkulaga@...>If 64k is an int, then I'd say use a long and be done with it.
> Will a 65000 limit be acceptable, or should I just say "damn the
> torpedoes" and go for a limit in the billions?
> Oh, how's the new page layout look, guys? I think the font is tooI think it looks great!
> big, my fault for doing the editing on a 17" monitor. Other than
> that, I kind of like it.
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-13 20:47:51 UTC
Great deal on rotary encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-07-14 06:58:53 UTC
Re: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-14 08:07:13 UTC
Re: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-14 16:49:32 UTC
RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-07-14 19:53:53 UTC
Re: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tom Kulaga
1999-07-14 21:06:46 UTC
RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
WAnliker@x...
1999-07-14 21:25:59 UTC
Re: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-14 22:14:18 UTC
RE: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Charles Gallo
1999-07-15 03:22:47 UTC
Re: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-07-15 06:35:52 UTC
Re: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-15 08:31:54 UTC
Re: Great deal on rotary encoders
Matt Shaver
1999-07-15 08:37:35 UTC
Re: RE: Great deal on rotary encoders
Tom Kulaga
1999-07-16 18:39:31 UTC
Re: Great deal on rotary encoders
Dan Mauch
1999-07-17 07:20:28 UTC
Re: Re: Great deal on rotary encoders