Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Posted by
Brian
on 2002-01-06 17:13:57 UTC
Seems like some spilled milk, try a PPK Walther 8 axis machine, generates
program's in the millions of lines, one my buddy works on just had a bug fix
in the softwear, cost $10,000 for upgrade only one month old. now the
company planned to have those expenses, but the machine can do more than
ever before and continues to be "top-of-the -line" machine that they need. I
could buy a house for the cost of the softwear they use to run that
machine!!!!!!!! cul brian f.
program's in the millions of lines, one my buddy works on just had a bug fix
in the softwear, cost $10,000 for upgrade only one month old. now the
company planned to have those expenses, but the machine can do more than
ever before and continues to be "top-of-the -line" machine that they need. I
could buy a house for the cost of the softwear they use to run that
machine!!!!!!!! cul brian f.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Smith" <sos@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 12:09 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
> I read it the same way you do, John.
>
> stevenson_engineers wrote:
>
> > If I read the above correctly and put it in plain english you are
> > saying the customer buys the licence for that particular CD and only
> > that CD.?
>
> This is a pretty standard software sales approach.
>
> > Vector has the right to decide if and when the next upgrade / bug fix
> > is chargable ?
>
> Most companies I've dealt with have a clearer policy than this, but I
agree
> that this is what Fred is saying. This is true with any company; the bad
> taste in our mouths is that it sounds like we pay every time (as you say
> next). How often do upgrades happen with Vector? I'd hate to be out $100 a
> year ($50 per upgrade) trying to keep my software current.
>
> > V 9 was a paid upgrade, 9.3 was a paid upgrade and 9.x will be a paid
> > upgrade??
>
> Hard to tell, but it seems very likely. I wish I had known this in
advance.
>
> Autodesk approaches this differently than Vector. Upgrades within a major
> version number (2.0, 2.1...) are free for downloading. When a major
version
> change occurs, significant improvements in functionality occur. Owners of
the
> old version can upgrade for a reasonable fee. Users need to perceive
upgrades
> described as major as actually being significantly different.
>
> Vector being 32 bit is a nice feature. There were other items too, but 32
bit
> was the main change. I keep debating with myself over whether this would
> qualify as a major upgrade and not being sure. It certainly would look
like
> one if it happened a quarter later and had additional features.
>
> > Will the bug fix that stops you pocketing with an elipse as an island
> > be a paid upgrade ?
>
> Bugs with no workaround should be patched for free. Always, by any
company. I
> haven't been following the ellipse issue, so I don't know if the
workaround
> is practical or not (which clearly affects the priority of patching now or
> waiting until the next release).
>
> Steve Smith
>
> >
> > John S.
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> >
> > Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> > Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> > URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> > bill,
> > List Manager
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
IMService
2002-01-05 10:48:33 UTC
CAM software upgrade policy
Lee and Amy Wenger
2002-01-05 11:14:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAM software upgrade policy
imserv1
2002-01-05 14:02:42 UTC
Re: CAM software upgrade policy
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-05 14:28:36 UTC
Re: CAM software upgrade policy
imserv1
2002-01-05 15:15:20 UTC
Re: CAM software upgrade policy
stevenson_engineers
2002-01-05 15:58:18 UTC
Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Steve Smith
2002-01-05 21:07:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Chris L
2002-01-05 22:32:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Tim Goldstein
2002-01-05 23:42:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CAM software upgrade policy
ballendo
2002-01-06 00:36:46 UTC
Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Craig Chamberlin
2002-01-06 02:02:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Fitch R. Williams
2002-01-06 07:35:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
wanliker@a...
2002-01-06 09:23:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Brian
2002-01-06 17:13:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy
Steve Smith
2002-01-06 21:17:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CAM software upgrade policy