Heatsinking the G210's ??
Posted by
Doug Fortune
on 2002-02-14 19:51:24 UTC
"audiomaker2000" wrote:
(I think), that might be considered overkill. Just slap some
compound goo on the bottom (too much is worse than none at all)
and bolt it to something metal.
The G201 is straight forward, say you have
a 200 step/revolution stepper. Since the
G201 is a 10 microstep driver, it takes
200*10 = 2000 steps (from the computer)
to cause 200 full steps to the motor.
Therefore, 2000 steps from the computer
program and the motor revolves once. Conversely
the resolution is 1 step = 1/2000 revolution.
Now imagine that you have the motor direct
driving a 10 TPI screw.
If you are using (for example, Master5) which
currently has a maximum limit of 8000 steps/sec
(actually 8192 exactly), then you can only
turn the screw 4 times/second (8000 steps/sec
divided by 2000 steps/revolution).
And turning a 10 TPI screw 4 times a second
only gets you 0.4" /second == 24 inches/minute.
-------------------------
If that is too slow, get a G210 step multiplier
which (in *10 mode) generates 10 pulses to the
driver, for every step out the parallel port.
So now your machine goes 240 inches/minute,
but unfortunately the resolution is 1/10th
(ie more coarse) than what it was before.
Or you can set the drive to *5 mode which will
give you 120 inches/minute, with a resolution of
1/5 of what it was with the G201.
Or you can also go to *2 mode giving 48 inches/minute.
Or you can go to *1 mode, which gives the same as
the G201.
-----------------------
However, I have a question for Mariss: using *10 mode,
is the fault limit 13 'Times Ten' counts (ie 127/10)
or is it still +/- 127 counts. In other words, if
the motor shaft was fixed immovably in *10 mode, would
the drive fault at 13 steps, or fault at 127 steps?
regards
Doug Fortune
http://www.cncKITS.com
.
> Anyway, aside from now being TOTALLY lost on the multiplierAt a worst case heat dissipation of around 13 Watts/driver
> issue on the G210's vs the G201s (thanks all ;-) ), I am
> preparing to mount the drives.
>
> I am planning to use the giant aluminum heatsink that is
> original to the Bridgeport Boss (about 1' X 3.5'..yes, feet).
(I think), that might be considered overkill. Just slap some
compound goo on the bottom (too much is worse than none at all)
and bolt it to something metal.
> (BTW, I got the G210's because Master5 is on my list ofHere is my attempt at explaining it:
> software I wish to try and I got the impression that 8xxx
> steps per second via the motherboard timer might require this
> "multiplier")
The G201 is straight forward, say you have
a 200 step/revolution stepper. Since the
G201 is a 10 microstep driver, it takes
200*10 = 2000 steps (from the computer)
to cause 200 full steps to the motor.
Therefore, 2000 steps from the computer
program and the motor revolves once. Conversely
the resolution is 1 step = 1/2000 revolution.
Now imagine that you have the motor direct
driving a 10 TPI screw.
If you are using (for example, Master5) which
currently has a maximum limit of 8000 steps/sec
(actually 8192 exactly), then you can only
turn the screw 4 times/second (8000 steps/sec
divided by 2000 steps/revolution).
And turning a 10 TPI screw 4 times a second
only gets you 0.4" /second == 24 inches/minute.
-------------------------
If that is too slow, get a G210 step multiplier
which (in *10 mode) generates 10 pulses to the
driver, for every step out the parallel port.
So now your machine goes 240 inches/minute,
but unfortunately the resolution is 1/10th
(ie more coarse) than what it was before.
Or you can set the drive to *5 mode which will
give you 120 inches/minute, with a resolution of
1/5 of what it was with the G201.
Or you can also go to *2 mode giving 48 inches/minute.
Or you can go to *1 mode, which gives the same as
the G201.
-----------------------
However, I have a question for Mariss: using *10 mode,
is the fault limit 13 'Times Ten' counts (ie 127/10)
or is it still +/- 127 counts. In other words, if
the motor shaft was fixed immovably in *10 mode, would
the drive fault at 13 steps, or fault at 127 steps?
regards
Doug Fortune
http://www.cncKITS.com
.
Discussion Thread
audiomaker2000
2002-02-14 19:35:39 UTC
Heatsinking the G210's ??
Doug Fortune
2002-02-14 19:51:24 UTC
Heatsinking the G210's ??
audiomaker2000
2002-02-14 20:37:22 UTC
Re: Heatsinking the G210's ??
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-14 20:48:14 UTC
Re: Heatsinking the G210's ??
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 20:51:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Heatsinking the G210's ??
audiomaker2000
2002-02-14 21:18:52 UTC
Re: Heatsinking the G210's ??
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 21:38:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Heatsinking the G210's ??
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-14 21:50:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Heatsinking the G210's ??
mariss92705
2002-02-15 13:00:29 UTC
Re: Heatsinking the G210's ??