CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201

Posted by JanRwl@A...
on 2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC
In a message dated 14-Feb-02 12:45:47 Central Standard Time,
mariss92705@... writes:


> (3) The multiplier board permits (1) while having (2) as well. It does this
> by generating 10 step pulses for every step pulse it receives. It then
> sends those pulses on to the 10 uStep drive it is sitting in. The result is
> a motor that moves with microstep smoothness while the drive appears as a
> full step one to the software.
>
> It's a "have your cake and eat it too" situation.<< Marie WHO???


So, then, Mariss, with the G210, if you put the jumper on the "X10" position,
and send ONE step-pulse to the G210's input, you get TEN microsteps to the
motor? So, if you send 1KH steps (assuming you have properly accel/decel.
your pulses) to the G210, it then sends 10,000 "microsteps" to the motor?
What does this look like on a 'scope? Stair-stepped 'sine waves', or what?
(I must warm up my Tektronics and see for myself!) but how/when does the
drive "know" it has been sent pulses FASTER than it can output TEN TIMES as
many? This is CONFUSIN' to us cerebrally-challenged Gecko-Users! (they work
fine, tho, with the X10 jumper selected!)

Wish there was some simple graphics on the "white sheet" shipped with the
G210's! Like, "HERE's what's happening between your input-pulses and the
motor-winding outputs:"

Jan Rowland


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

zemenz2003 2002-02-12 15:02:42 UTC Geck G201 Art Fenerty 2002-02-12 15:14:40 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-12 15:22:48 UTC Re: Geck G201 Alan Marconett KM6VV 2002-02-12 15:57:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 Bob Campbell 2002-02-12 16:34:05 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:01 UTC Re: Geck G201 methadras 2002-02-12 17:37:56 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-12 17:53:29 UTC Re: Geck G201 studleylee 2002-02-13 09:16:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 cadcamcenter 2002-02-13 17:46:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 19:18:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 20:47:36 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-13 21:30:09 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-13 22:16:37 UTC Re: Geck G201 Scot Rogers 2002-02-13 23:54:03 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 Drew Rogge 2002-02-14 08:07:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 09:12:02 UTC Re: Geck G201 Spam Box 2002-02-14 09:28:32 UTC [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 mariss92705 2002-02-14 10:45:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:21:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 18:59:59 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:10:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 19:47:44 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:12:05 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:26:08 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-14 21:33:51 UTC Re: Geck G201 JanRwl@A... 2002-02-14 21:41:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 16:29:09 UTC Re: Geck G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 17:31:25 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-20 20:52:15 UTC Re: Geck G201 ballendo 2002-02-20 23:51:56 UTC Re: Gecko G201 fast1994gto 2002-02-20 23:52:58 UTC Re: Geck G201 luisguillermo98 2002-02-21 14:52:48 UTC Re: Gecko G201