Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Posted by
John H.
on 2002-02-17 04:47:13 UTC
This wasn't explained to us in physics for some reason. You have two coils
opposite each other in your transformer. The field expands and collapses
over the coil opposite. The laminate stops it turning the supports into part
of the equation, fine. But if you look down on a transformer from the top it
looks like 50% of each coil is pointing the 'wrong' way. The field is
emitted in a spiral shape up each coil which should also be present _behind_
the coil pointing away from the other coil. We were told that we should
assume transformers to be close to 100% efficiency. Does the presence of
another coil somehow shape the field? This has been annoying me for a good
while, that means it's probably a really simple answer.
Regards,
John H.
opposite each other in your transformer. The field expands and collapses
over the coil opposite. The laminate stops it turning the supports into part
of the equation, fine. But if you look down on a transformer from the top it
looks like 50% of each coil is pointing the 'wrong' way. The field is
emitted in a spiral shape up each coil which should also be present _behind_
the coil pointing away from the other coil. We were told that we should
assume transformers to be close to 100% efficiency. Does the presence of
another coil somehow shape the field? This has been annoying me for a good
while, that means it's probably a really simple answer.
Regards,
John H.
> > When you mount transformers so close to each other as is picturedthis
> > here don't they interfere with each other's magnetic fields?
>
>
> Not power-transformers of this size. Audio-transfomers might do some
> "crosstalk", and 1 KVA or more might oughta be "at right angles", if
> touching, or nearly-so. But MOST of the magnetic flux in a
> decently-efficient transformer is "internal". Now, a TORROID won't HAVE
> problem, but costs more, and can't be home-brewed as easily... Good
> question!
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-16 17:30:31 UTC
New Pix UP!
pfrederick1
2002-02-16 18:27:16 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-16 19:41:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
fast1994gto
2002-02-16 19:49:19 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Mr. sausage
2002-02-16 21:39:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:46:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:50:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Jon Elson
2002-02-16 23:04:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
John H.
2002-02-17 04:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 10:24:05 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 11:17:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
Bill Vance
2002-02-17 11:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 16:40:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
ballendo
2002-02-17 22:43:15 UTC
Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 23:45:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-18 18:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!