Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
    Posted by
    
      JanRwl@A...
    
  
  
    on 2002-02-17 23:45:38 UTC
  
  Ball End:  Hope you can accept ANOTHER group-member's input on this point:
In a message dated 18-Feb-02 01:31:16 Central Standard Time,
ballendo@... writes:
although not quite as efficiently.
layer-wound coils, high-grade "paper" (not sure of letter; "H"?).
Well-terminated winding-ends, whether "solder-tags" or lead-wires, done
RIGHT.
would need to have "seen a few, over the years" for this to be a valid
statement.
Ol' Troll's opinions—— Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
In a message dated 18-Feb-02 01:31:16 Central Standard Time,
ballendo@... writes:
> I've understood this to be true of toroid construction. Is it also true forWhat is "true of..."? Flux-trapping? It is also true for E-I construction,
> I-E types?<<
although not quite as efficiently.
>Solidly-stacked (no "air-gaps" in lay-up of E-I cores), ideally-insulated
> Could you elaborate on what means "built right" with respect to the types
> of power transformers this list would typically use? <<
layer-wound coils, high-grade "paper" (not sure of letter; "H"?).
Well-terminated winding-ends, whether "solder-tags" or lead-wires, done
RIGHT.
>Visual quality is often indicator of "how GOOD it really is". But maybe, one
> What should we look for when deciding between two or more (surplus) power
> transformers, assuming volts and amps meet our needs...?<<
would need to have "seen a few, over the years" for this to be a valid
statement.
Ol' Troll's opinions—— Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
  
    Alan Marconett KM6VV
  
2002-02-16 17:30:31 UTC
  New Pix UP!
  
    pfrederick1
  
2002-02-16 18:27:16 UTC
  Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Raymond Heckert
  
2002-02-16 19:41:04 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
  
    fast1994gto
  
2002-02-16 19:49:19 UTC
  Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Mr. sausage
  
2002-02-16 21:39:29 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
  
    JanRwl@A...
  
2002-02-16 21:46:03 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
  
    JanRwl@A...
  
2002-02-16 21:50:18 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Jon Elson
  
2002-02-16 23:04:28 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
  
    John H.
  
2002-02-17 04:47:13 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Alan Marconett KM6VV
  
2002-02-17 10:24:05 UTC
  Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Alan Marconett KM6VV
  
2002-02-17 11:17:59 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
  
    Bill Vance
  
2002-02-17 11:39:10 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
  
    JanRwl@A...
  
2002-02-17 16:40:25 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
  
    ballendo
  
2002-02-17 22:43:15 UTC
  Transformer 101?   was Re: New Pix UP!
  
    JanRwl@A...
  
2002-02-17 23:45:38 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101?   was Re: New Pix UP!
  
    Raymond Heckert
  
2002-02-18 18:28:10 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101?   was Re: New Pix UP!