Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2002-02-17 11:17:59 UTC
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the kind words!
It's probably not obvious in the pix, but the motor wire bundles are
actually a little above those of the inputs. Yeah, I had thought about
separating them even more, but I don't want wires crossing over the
Gecko's!
I did use Tye-Wraps, but every time I'd put one on, I'd wish I'd put it
another place! So I held off putting a huge ammount of them on
initially, and had planned to add more as I finished the wiring looms.
Didn't seem like I needed 'em! I still have a few limit sw lines to
run, so I'll probably add a few more. I like the nylon line for cabling
also, but I'll make do with the Tyes, as this isn't going onboard a Sub,
or F16!
Alan KM6VV
JanRwl@... wrote:
Thanks for the kind words!
It's probably not obvious in the pix, but the motor wire bundles are
actually a little above those of the inputs. Yeah, I had thought about
separating them even more, but I don't want wires crossing over the
Gecko's!
I did use Tye-Wraps, but every time I'd put one on, I'd wish I'd put it
another place! So I held off putting a huge ammount of them on
initially, and had planned to add more as I finished the wiring looms.
Didn't seem like I needed 'em! I still have a few limit sw lines to
run, so I'll probably add a few more. I like the nylon line for cabling
also, but I'll make do with the Tyes, as this isn't going onboard a Sub,
or F16!
Alan KM6VV
JanRwl@... wrote:
>
> Alan! Excellent workmanship and layout-engineering, but, opto-isolator
> inputs to the Gecko drives notwithstanding, it gives me the heebie-jeebies to
> have the input-lines nearly in the same harness as the motor-winding wires!
> I will be mounting TWO G210's inside an application-specific plotter I am
> cobbling, and I envision running the motor-wires "at right angles" to the
> input-wiring, where they must cross, at least for an inch or so before "going
> parallel" to them. Is this "overkill"? or "electrical paranoia"???
>
> Wow, you did the harnessing nicely without Tye-Wraps! I'd have used a good
> 100 of 'em in that! Or, braided nylon cable-thread?
>
> Appreciate you putting these photos here for all to see! This is what it's
> all about!
>
> Jan Rowland
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-16 17:30:31 UTC
New Pix UP!
pfrederick1
2002-02-16 18:27:16 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-16 19:41:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
fast1994gto
2002-02-16 19:49:19 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Mr. sausage
2002-02-16 21:39:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:46:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:50:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Jon Elson
2002-02-16 23:04:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
John H.
2002-02-17 04:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 10:24:05 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 11:17:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
Bill Vance
2002-02-17 11:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 16:40:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
ballendo
2002-02-17 22:43:15 UTC
Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 23:45:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-18 18:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!