Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-02-17 16:40:25 UTC
In a message dated 17-Feb-02 13:23:09 Central Standard Time, KM6VV@...
writes:
assume you'd keep these "signal groups" in separate looms (two "cables" in
same area).
Good show.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> It's probably not obvious in the pix, but the motor wire bundles areYeah, I actually could see that; if you DO tye-wrap everything "up tight", I
> actually a little above those of the inputs
assume you'd keep these "signal groups" in separate looms (two "cables" in
same area).
Good show.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-16 17:30:31 UTC
New Pix UP!
pfrederick1
2002-02-16 18:27:16 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-16 19:41:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
fast1994gto
2002-02-16 19:49:19 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Mr. sausage
2002-02-16 21:39:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:46:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-16 21:50:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Jon Elson
2002-02-16 23:04:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
John H.
2002-02-17 04:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 10:24:05 UTC
Re: New Pix UP!
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2002-02-17 11:17:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
Bill Vance
2002-02-17 11:39:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 16:40:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] New Pix UP!
ballendo
2002-02-17 22:43:15 UTC
Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-17 23:45:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-18 18:28:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Transformer 101? was Re: New Pix UP!