Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Posted by
catboat15@a...
on 2002-02-17 20:29:08 UTC
In a message dated 2/17/2002 1:53:04 PM Pacific Standard Time,
whollid1@... writes:
about it but any belt (except specials) are joined at some spot and they
create vibration when running. Some people on our lists have replaces
regular V belts with a joint by using "Link Belts" These don't have any one
joint, but each link acts as a joint and the users claim smoother running and
cutting. Plus on some machines such as many of our older hobby lathes to
change a V belt you must remove the spindle and it is a chore to get it out
and replaced correctly, with the link belts you can just thread it through
the openings and link it together.
John Meacham
3-1/2 gauge, LBSC Virginia
Plus many in process or in thoughts
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
whollid1@... writes:
> What I doGear heads are smoother in operation on lathe or mills. We don't often think
> not understand is the functional difference between a gear head
> machine, versus a belt driven machine.
about it but any belt (except specials) are joined at some spot and they
create vibration when running. Some people on our lists have replaces
regular V belts with a joint by using "Link Belts" These don't have any one
joint, but each link acts as a joint and the users claim smoother running and
cutting. Plus on some machines such as many of our older hobby lathes to
change a V belt you must remove the spindle and it is a chore to get it out
and replaced correctly, with the link belts you can just thread it through
the openings and link it together.
John Meacham
3-1/2 gauge, LBSC Virginia
Plus many in process or in thoughts
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2000-11-16 15:05:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Carey L. Culpepper
2000-12-14 07:21:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2000-12-19 13:19:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
wanliker@a...
2001-01-11 16:08:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Smoke
2001-11-24 09:45:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
catboat15@a...
2002-02-17 20:29:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2002-02-17 22:30:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2002-02-17 22:40:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
catboat15@a...
2002-02-18 07:43:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Dan Mauch
2002-06-26 10:01:26 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
luisguillermo98
2002-06-26 12:21:39 UTC
Re: (unknown)
bilg63475
2002-06-26 13:56:55 UTC
Re: (unknown)
luisguillermo98
2002-06-26 15:31:59 UTC
Re: (unknown)
Shelbyville Design & Signworks
2002-07-11 14:31:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Doug Harrison
2002-07-11 15:47:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2002-10-08 11:08:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Art
2002-11-03 16:14:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2002-12-10 22:53:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Raymond Heckert
2002-12-11 15:42:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Robert Campbell
2003-05-28 07:29:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
R Petersen
2003-05-28 20:34:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)CNC rebuild help
Brian
2003-08-16 05:44:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Jon Elson
2003-10-21 10:35:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
JanRwl@A...
2004-03-03 12:35:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] (unknown)
Monte
2004-03-04 06:35:28 UTC
Re: (unknown)
keith
2004-03-04 07:29:46 UTC
RE: jerry's power supply .pdf