Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2002-02-25 22:27:14 UTC
In a message dated 25-Feb-02 14:35:23 Central Standard Time,
paul_hvidston@... writes:
terms", but they seem to be translating English from Farsi, or some-such.
The way that works is this: Say you select the "X10" position (where you put
the header inside). Then, you must send TEN pulses TO the driver to get
1/200th of a turn of the stepper out. AND, this "step" is very smooth, being
ten "micro-steps". Or, if you had chosen the "X2" header-position, that then
works like "half-stepping". If you put the header on the "X1" position, you
have to send 2000 pulses to the G210 to make the motor turn ONE revolution.
Makes for a much smoother motor-rotation, actually, once the
cerebral-challenge is overcome! Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
paul_hvidston@... writes:
> Am I missing something?Yes. I tried to get Mariss and his staff to explain this in "layman's
terms", but they seem to be translating English from Farsi, or some-such.
The way that works is this: Say you select the "X10" position (where you put
the header inside). Then, you must send TEN pulses TO the driver to get
1/200th of a turn of the stepper out. AND, this "step" is very smooth, being
ten "micro-steps". Or, if you had chosen the "X2" header-position, that then
works like "half-stepping". If you put the header on the "X1" position, you
have to send 2000 pulses to the G210 to make the motor turn ONE revolution.
Makes for a much smoother motor-rotation, actually, once the
cerebral-challenge is overcome! Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 12:34:23 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 12:53:06 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Guy Sirois
2002-02-25 12:56:03 UTC
RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 13:02:35 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 15:14:13 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Paul R. Hvidston
2002-02-25 17:10:56 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Guy Sirois
2002-02-25 17:26:47 UTC
RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 19:14:09 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:27:14 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:30:34 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-25 22:45:54 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-25 22:58:24 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
audiomaker2000
2002-02-25 23:17:25 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
the_dutros
2002-02-26 05:58:05 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
rsgoldner
2002-02-26 06:06:55 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
mariss92705
2002-02-26 07:56:17 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
JanRwl@A...
2002-02-26 09:43:23 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Russ Revels
2002-02-26 17:08:27 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
wanliker@a...
2002-02-26 18:32:38 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Raymond Heckert
2002-02-26 19:48:36 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
Daniel J. Statman
2002-02-26 19:52:56 UTC
Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math
cdoughtynz
2002-02-26 20:31:14 UTC
Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math