CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math

Posted by rsgoldner
on 2002-02-26 06:06:55 UTC
In my understanding, the G201 requires 2000 pulse for one rev
(assuming a stepper motor with 200 steps per rev). I believe the
G210 IS the same when in 1X mode. However, the advantage of the G210
is if your controller can't output pulses fast enough. Then you can,
as an example, go to 10X mode. In this mode your controller would
output 200 pulses for one rev.

Mariss, please correct me if I am wrong.

--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "the_dutros" <the_dutros@y...> wrote:
> The user manual (in .PDF format) is available for the the G201 and
> the G210 at www.geckodrives.com.
>
> Briefly, the G210 is the same as a G201. The difference is the
G210
> adds a "multiplier" circuit.
>
> Per the manual, "this circuit puts out 1, 2, 5, or 10 pulses for
> every INPUT step pulse."
>
> So, if you want 2000 LPT pulses to make ONE revolution, you would
> select the "1X" jumper setting on the G210.
>
> OR, you can save $40 and get a G201 -- this is EXACTLY what the
G201
> does right out of the box.
>
> -DASH
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "audiomaker2000" <audiomaker@s...>
> wrote:
> > Ok Ok...seriously...which is it?
> >
> > I want to send 2000 pulses from the LPT to get one revolution
from
> a
> > motor that is stepping 2000 times per revolution.
> > (not sure I even needed the 210's for this)
> >
> > Sean

Discussion Thread

Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-25 12:34:23 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-25 12:53:06 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Guy Sirois 2002-02-25 12:56:03 UTC RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-25 13:02:35 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math mariss92705 2002-02-25 15:14:13 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Paul R. Hvidston 2002-02-25 17:10:56 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Guy Sirois 2002-02-25 17:26:47 UTC RE: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math mariss92705 2002-02-25 19:14:09 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math JanRwl@A... 2002-02-25 22:27:14 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math JanRwl@A... 2002-02-25 22:30:34 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math mariss92705 2002-02-25 22:45:54 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math JanRwl@A... 2002-02-25 22:58:24 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math audiomaker2000 2002-02-25 23:17:25 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math the_dutros 2002-02-26 05:58:05 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math rsgoldner 2002-02-26 06:06:55 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math mariss92705 2002-02-26 07:56:17 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math JanRwl@A... 2002-02-26 09:43:23 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Russ Revels 2002-02-26 17:08:27 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math wanliker@a... 2002-02-26 18:32:38 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Raymond Heckert 2002-02-26 19:48:36 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math Daniel J. Statman 2002-02-26 19:52:56 UTC Re: Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math cdoughtynz 2002-02-26 20:31:14 UTC Gecho 210 step multiplier, was Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Stepper Math