Re: EMC and WinNT
Posted by
Karl Klemm
on 1999-12-07 09:41:22 UTC
> That could indicate a memory, timing or bus problem with your hardware.Essentially that's what I did. I didn't have a spare motherboard to put
> Compiling the kernel tends to exercise the hardware somewhat more
> extensively than running Wincrap. On boards where I've had that problem,
> I've been successful by cutting back either the memory bus speed, the
> cpu clock speed or both.
>
> My preferred solution is to put in a new motherboard.
>
in the linux box, I'm a student doing this as an academic project. I
didn't know about the cutting back on the speed. Thanks.
Karl
Discussion Thread
Ron Hanson
1999-12-07 08:24:15 UTC
EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 08:56:02 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Phil Plumbo
1999-12-07 09:10:41 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:18:09 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:21:29 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:23:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:36:40 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 09:42:34 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:41:22 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:42:39 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:45:24 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:51:38 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:54:55 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 10:07:35 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:17:47 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:23:12 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Charles Hopkins
1999-12-07 13:30:38 UTC
RE: EMC and WinNT
Steve Carlisle
1999-12-07 17:30:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT