Re: EMC and WinNT
Posted by
paul@A...
on 1999-12-07 09:54:55 UTC
>Not really. Linux will compile just fine with 8 or 16 Mb, although you
> From: Karl Klemm <kklemm@...>
>
> > From: "Terry L. Ridder" <terrylr@...>
> >
> > hello;
> >
> > signal 11 on a kernel compile is a memory problem
> > not a kernel or rt-linux problem.
> >
>
> That's what I was told. However, when I swapped in some RAM that I knew
> was ok, and was faster also, it didn't help, I still got the same
> errors. As I said before, when I put the linux HD in my PC, which has
> more RAM, it worked fine, so it may have been that for some reason I
> needed 64MB instead of 32.
wouldn't want to have X running with that little.
It probably would have worked if you had cut the clock and/or memory bus
speed back a notch or two. The real problem was your motherboard / CPU /
memory combination. It hard to get closer than that (and generally
not worth the effort).
--
Paul Amaranth | Rochester MI, USA
Aurora Group, Inc. | Systems & Software
paul@... | Unix / Windows / NT
Discussion Thread
Ron Hanson
1999-12-07 08:24:15 UTC
EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 08:56:02 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Phil Plumbo
1999-12-07 09:10:41 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:18:09 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:21:29 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:23:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:36:40 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 09:42:34 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:41:22 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:42:39 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:45:24 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:51:38 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:54:55 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 10:07:35 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:17:47 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:23:12 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Charles Hopkins
1999-12-07 13:30:38 UTC
RE: EMC and WinNT
Steve Carlisle
1999-12-07 17:30:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT