Re: EMC and WinNT
Posted by
stratton@m...
on 1999-12-07 09:51:38 UTC
>It's not the quantity of memory (that just makes the process go faster
> That's what I was told. However, when I swapped in some RAM that I knew
> was ok, and was faster also, it didn't help, I still got the same
> errors. As I said before, when I put the linux HD in my PC, which has
> more RAM, it worked fine, so it may have been that for some reason I
> needed 64MB instead of 32.
>
up to a point). Rather its a problem with either the hardware
interface to the memory (possibly timing) or some sort of error in the
memory managmnet routines of the kernel being run, that might be more
likely to crop up with certain configurations.
Chris
--
Christopher C. Stratton, stratton@...
Instrument Maker, Horn Player & Engineer
30 Griswold Street, Cambridge, MA 02138
http://www.mdc.net/~stratton
(617) 492-3358 home/shop
Discussion Thread
Ron Hanson
1999-12-07 08:24:15 UTC
EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 08:56:02 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Phil Plumbo
1999-12-07 09:10:41 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:18:09 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:21:29 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:23:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:36:40 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 09:42:34 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:41:22 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:42:39 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Karl Klemm
1999-12-07 09:45:24 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
stratton@m...
1999-12-07 09:51:38 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
paul@A...
1999-12-07 09:54:55 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Darrell
1999-12-07 10:07:35 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:17:47 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Jon Elson
1999-12-07 13:23:12 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT
Charles Hopkins
1999-12-07 13:30:38 UTC
RE: EMC and WinNT
Steve Carlisle
1999-12-07 17:30:10 UTC
Re: EMC and WinNT