RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: low cost drivers
Posted by
Carol & Jerry Jankura
on 2002-05-31 06:37:29 UTC
|Finally, this is no speed deamon. I can only get about 1000
|steps / second before I start loosing steps. This translates to a
|little over 7 IPM of motion.
I doubt that your speed problems are due to the board. It simply takes step
and direction information from your computer and converts it to phase
signals and amplifies those signals into voltage and current capabilities
that can drive your motors.
If you're having problems with speed, consider the following:
1. Are you running your G-Code interpreter in a DOS box under windows? If
so, your pulse train being sent to the board is not robust (you'll find some
really large gaps between pulses at apparently random times if you check
with a scope - that's the kiss of death for high speed operation). Try
booting directly into DOS and rerunning your G-Code interpreter. You might
find a fast improvement.
2. Is the system (motor and drivers) sufficiently powerful for the machine
that you're attempting to control. Stepper motors lose torque as operating
speed increases.
|My conclusion: unless you are REALLY hard on cash, and are
|not REALLY sure this CNC stuff is for you, go for the assembled
|stuff. This goes double if you aren't that slick with a soldering
|iron.
I reached a different conclusion than you did. My Sherline mill runs at
speeds of up to 4000 steps per second using the 2 amp board. And, that
limitation is due to the mechanical system, not the quality of Camtronics'
product. I would agree, however, that the instructions for building the kit
are not nearly as good as Sherline's instructions for using their tools.
But, then, Sherline is the exception in the machine tool business.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
|steps / second before I start loosing steps. This translates to a
|little over 7 IPM of motion.
I doubt that your speed problems are due to the board. It simply takes step
and direction information from your computer and converts it to phase
signals and amplifies those signals into voltage and current capabilities
that can drive your motors.
If you're having problems with speed, consider the following:
1. Are you running your G-Code interpreter in a DOS box under windows? If
so, your pulse train being sent to the board is not robust (you'll find some
really large gaps between pulses at apparently random times if you check
with a scope - that's the kiss of death for high speed operation). Try
booting directly into DOS and rerunning your G-Code interpreter. You might
find a fast improvement.
2. Is the system (motor and drivers) sufficiently powerful for the machine
that you're attempting to control. Stepper motors lose torque as operating
speed increases.
|My conclusion: unless you are REALLY hard on cash, and are
|not REALLY sure this CNC stuff is for you, go for the assembled
|stuff. This goes double if you aren't that slick with a soldering
|iron.
I reached a different conclusion than you did. My Sherline mill runs at
speeds of up to 4000 steps per second using the 2 amp board. And, that
limitation is due to the mechanical system, not the quality of Camtronics'
product. I would agree, however, that the instructions for building the kit
are not nearly as good as Sherline's instructions for using their tools.
But, then, Sherline is the exception in the machine tool business.
-- Carol & Jerry Jankura
Strongsville, Ohio
So many toys, so little time....
Discussion Thread
rekmac
2002-05-30 13:01:54 UTC
low cost drivers
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-30 16:40:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] low cost drivers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-05-30 17:01:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] low cost drivers
the_dutros
2002-05-30 22:38:04 UTC
Re: low cost drivers
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2002-05-30 23:03:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: low cost drivers
alenz2002
2002-05-31 04:00:38 UTC
Re: low cost drivers
turbulatordude
2002-05-31 05:05:04 UTC
Re: low cost drivers
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2002-05-31 06:37:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: low cost drivers
the_dutros
2002-05-31 07:08:17 UTC
Re: low cost drivers - reality
Mel Williams
2002-05-31 08:52:05 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] low cost drivers
rekmac
2002-05-31 12:10:19 UTC
Re: low cost drivers
mariss92705
2002-05-31 15:53:44 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
Les Watts
2002-05-31 16:14:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-31 17:18:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: low cost drivers
stevenson_engineers
2002-05-31 17:27:05 UTC
Re: low cost drivers
RC
2002-05-31 17:29:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
RC
2002-05-31 17:33:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: low cost drivers
mariss92705
2002-05-31 17:34:36 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
RC
2002-05-31 17:56:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
Les Watts
2002-05-31 18:26:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
JanRwl@A...
2002-05-31 18:46:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
stephen_stallings
2002-05-31 18:54:25 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
Tim Goldstein
2002-06-01 10:07:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] low cost drivers
RC
2002-06-01 13:15:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
JanRwl@A...
2002-06-01 20:04:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
StevenManzer
2002-06-26 02:04:22 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
Carlos Guillermo
2002-06-26 05:30:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
steveggca
2002-06-26 06:01:58 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers
ballendo
2002-06-27 05:26:03 UTC
Cheap Power Supply was Re: low cost drivers