Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control

Jon:
I have been pondering what you said about the use of a GE 1050 to
machine 5-axis simultaneous. I misled you when I said 250 IPM!! It should
be 25 IPM!!! I have two machines that I use daily with Fagor 8025
controls. The feed rate code for the Fagor is "F250" which means 25.0 IPM.
Oops, I forgot that little decimal point!
Anyway, all I really need would be 25, maybe 35 IPM max 5-axis
simultaneous. Do you think the GE would do that?

Gus

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Elson" <elson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control


> accellodyne wrote:
>
> > Anybody know about GE 1050 controls (1981) on an old Monarch VMC75?
> > I have a 4-axis model and want to add an axis to make it five.
> > According to GE, they think it will work but I'd like to hear from a
> > nuts and bolts guy that it will work if done properly. I understand
> > I will need to rewrite the MSD tape and install some more boards,
> > calibrate, etc. Before I go thru all that I want to be sure the
> > control will produce simultaneous 5-axis movement at 250 SFPM. I
> > want to drip feed 5-axis code to the control with a BTR and a PC. I
> > don't need compensation and all the fancy canned cycles that are
> > normally in most controls.
>
> Does this system provide simultaneous 4-axis motion at 250 IPM?
> That's pretty amazing. I had an Allen-Bradley 7320, a contemporary
> of yours, and it was VERY sluggish, as it only had a 100 Hz servo update
> rate. That gave it about a 3 Hz system bandwidth. Unless the machine is
> really huge (like 50-foot bed) I can't imagine going 250 IPM with the AB.
> (You must have meant 250 IPM, not SFPM in your message, as that would
> be 3000 IPM! Anyway, SFPM is usually used to measure cutting tool
> motion, and IPM is used for feed rate.)
>
> Do you have the facilities to change the executive program? (I assume
> that is what you are talking about with the "MSD tape".) I didn't, as
that
> was done at the factory, I guess. I made some small changes by editing
> the binary code, but I wouldn't waste that much time on it again.
>
> The main reason to have a long think about this is the reliability of
these
> old controls. I ran the A-B for about 6 months, and had 3 major
breakdowns
> on it. Although I could diagnose and repair these problems, it was
becoming
> a pain. I replaced it with a PC and the EMC program, and have had no
> problems with that, in 2+ years of use. Look up the prices of repair
boards
> for your GE control before going any further.
>
> Jon
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this as a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>