Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Posted by
Harlan Gustafson
on 2002-07-03 07:28:38 UTC
Will EMC accept "dripfeeding" of complex 5-axis code with minimal following
error at say 50 IPM? Can a tool changer be programmed? This machine has a
sixth axis parallel to the Z-axis for positioning the entire head of the
machine. Can EMC handle this additional axis for positioning only?
Gus
error at say 50 IPM? Can a tool changer be programmed? This machine has a
sixth axis parallel to the Z-axis for positioning the entire head of the
machine. Can EMC handle this additional axis for positioning only?
Gus
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Elson" <elson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
> Harlan Gustafson wrote:
>
> > Jon:
> > You've got me thinking EMC or other modern "soft" control program. Is
EMC
> > the way to go or are there other packages that would be better or
easier?
>
> I'm an EMC convert. It is not for everybody, but I really don't think it
is any
> more trouble than many of the other programs, which have their own
> difficulties.
>
> >
> > Even if they are not freeware? I've heard about "OpenCNC" but that is
> > expensive($15k for 5-axis). How about Master5, Win PCNC, AHHA, or
TurboCNC?
> > I'm a C programmer and I really don't want to have to reinvent the
wheel
> > but if I have to I'd rather do it in the public domain with help
hopefully
> > from people like you and Ray Henry. So, maybe EMC is the way to go.
What
> > does anyone else think?
>
> If you are already fluent in C, make, your favorite Unix editor, etc. then
you will
> be way ahead on the learning curve.
>
> As far as performance, options and very smooth motion, EMC is very good.
> I haven't used the others, but I have seen them at the NAMES show and
other
> places, and our EMC systems did VERY well in comparison.
>
> The one thing EMC lacks right now is hard threading. There are other ways
> to handle this, so it is not a big problem on a milling machine. It is a
pain
> on a lathe, however.
>
> Jon
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this as a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
accellodyne
2002-06-06 23:02:48 UTC
GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-06-07 05:25:52 UTC
Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-06-07 08:38:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control
Michael Milligan
2002-06-07 11:34:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-06-07 12:08:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-06-07 13:01:09 UTC
Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-06-08 13:26:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-06-08 13:46:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-06-08 13:53:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-06-08 15:39:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-06-08 15:52:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-06-08 16:01:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-06-09 07:45:05 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-06-26 11:14:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-06-26 19:14:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-02 16:13:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Doug Harrison
2002-07-02 20:39:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-07-02 21:12:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Joll503@A...
2002-07-02 22:38:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
William Scalione
2002-07-02 22:46:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
rainnea
2002-07-03 01:23:58 UTC
Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-03 05:54:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control
rainnea
2002-07-03 06:06:02 UTC
Re: GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-03 07:28:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-03 11:45:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Bill Vance
2002-07-03 12:20:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-07-03 18:19:11 UTC
Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-07-03 22:55:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-04 10:21:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-07-04 11:00:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Harlan Gustafson
2002-07-04 11:29:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Jon Elson
2002-07-04 22:30:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-07-05 08:05:38 UTC
Re: Re: GE 1050CM control
Ray Henry
2002-07-05 08:07:47 UTC
Re: Re: GE 1050CM control