CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2002-07-03 22:55:17 UTC
Harlan Gustafson wrote:

> Will EMC accept "dripfeeding" of complex 5-axis code with minimal following
> error at say 50 IPM? Can a tool changer be programmed? This machine has a
> sixth axis parallel to the Z-axis for positioning the entire head of the
> machine. Can EMC handle this additional axis for positioning only?

No. Dripfeeding is a holdover from NC machines that didn't have any
computer in them at all, or very limited memory. Dripfeeding should
only be seen in the Smithsonian!

When you have a 1 GB+ disk on the computer running EMC, dripfeeding
sounds like a bad joke. It also makes lookahead impossible, and that is one
of the best features of EMC.

There are ways to handle a toolchanger, but they are not "plug and play"
at all, at this point. There are some people working on it.

Yes, in the way the extra axis (really a W axis, parallel to and in addition
to the normal Z) would normally be used, when the other axes are not
moving, EMC could certainly handle this.

Jon

Discussion Thread

accellodyne 2002-06-06 23:02:48 UTC GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-06-07 05:25:52 UTC Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-06-07 08:38:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control Michael Milligan 2002-06-07 11:34:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-06-07 12:08:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-06-07 13:01:09 UTC Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-06-08 13:26:42 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-06-08 13:46:47 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-06-08 13:53:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-06-08 15:39:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-06-08 15:52:56 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-06-08 16:01:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-06-09 07:45:05 UTC Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-06-26 11:14:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-06-26 19:14:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-02 16:13:58 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Doug Harrison 2002-07-02 20:39:03 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-07-02 21:12:22 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Joll503@A... 2002-07-02 22:38:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control William Scalione 2002-07-02 22:46:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control rainnea 2002-07-03 01:23:58 UTC Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-03 05:54:30 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: GE 1050CM control rainnea 2002-07-03 06:06:02 UTC Re: GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-03 07:28:38 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-03 11:45:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Bill Vance 2002-07-03 12:20:52 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-07-03 18:19:11 UTC Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-07-03 22:55:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-04 10:21:37 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-07-04 11:00:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Harlan Gustafson 2002-07-04 11:29:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Jon Elson 2002-07-04 22:30:41 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-07-05 08:05:38 UTC Re: Re: GE 1050CM control Ray Henry 2002-07-05 08:07:47 UTC Re: Re: GE 1050CM control