Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
Posted by
miadsgns <MIADSGNS@a...
on 2003-02-12 10:07:56 UTC
Ref: Post 56899 Specs on the Micro Mill 47158
Randy, Ballendo, and others interested:
The 47158 "could be fitted with a 12" table" I don't see why not. As
far as the original table travel, 9" may not be that ample for some
work, but it is perfect for making small molds something I am looking
to do.
Anyone else with any information to fill some of the CNC retrofit
info blanks, please see the reference post 56899.
Thanks,
Mario
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo <ballendo@y...>"
<ballendo@y...> wrote:
Randy, Ballendo, and others interested:
The 47158 "could be fitted with a 12" table" I don't see why not. As
far as the original table travel, 9" may not be that ample for some
work, but it is perfect for making small molds something I am looking
to do.
Anyone else with any information to fill some of the CNC retrofit
info blanks, please see the reference post 56899.
Thanks,
Mario
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "ballendo <ballendo@y...>"
<ballendo@y...> wrote:
> Randy,our
>
> I looked at one of these recently at HF. It's not a problem.
>
> (Unless you have loaded a hundred pound item and are using the
> extremes of travel! And even then, probably not. I was looking at
> this and wondering (don't know how long it had been there, as at
> local HF it was hidden under the bench which has the 7x,9x and 3-in-1
> machines) WHY they don't make the table a bit longer...the
>
> It would be VERY possible to mfr this machine as a 12 inch X...
>
> And as the previous poster noted, it's a great little machine for
> price. I don't think one needs to change to ball screws; as long asthe
> the backlash adjustment is tended to... (which is made MUCH easier
> than the mill drills, BTW)
>
> Compared to the proxxon or similar: this would give far more bang,
> IMO, for about the same bucks!
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Ballendo
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Randy Gordon-Gilmore
> <zephyrus@r...> wrote:
> > At 10:24 PM 2/11/2003 -0000, mario wrote:
> >
> > >Maximun X Travel: 9"
> > [snip]
> > >Table Size: 9-3/8"x5-3/8"
> >
> > This makes me think...the table length is only 3/8" longer than
> quoted==
> > travel. The table will be halfway off the X ways at each end of
> its full
> > travel. Maybe not a problem, but I'd watch it carefully.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Randy
> >
> > Randy Gordon-Gilmore ,----.___________ ______________
> _________________
> > ProtoTrains // = = === == || == == == = || == ==
> = == =|--
> > Rio Vista, CA, USA /-O==O------------o==o------------o==o--------
> -o==o-'http://www.prototrains.com
> > zephyrus@r...
Discussion Thread
miadsgns <MIADSGNS@a...
2003-02-11 12:21:43 UTC
Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
j.guenther
2003-02-11 13:01:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
miadsgns <MIADSGNS@a...
2003-02-11 14:24:44 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-02-11 15:28:56 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-12 08:02:37 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
miadsgns <MIADSGNS@a...
2003-02-12 10:07:56 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-12 19:14:27 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
miadsgns <MIADSGNS@a...
2003-02-13 11:34:37 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-02-13 13:40:01 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-02-13 13:48:09 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
Jack Sullivan
2003-02-13 13:51:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-16 16:59:52 UTC
Re: Harbor Freight Micro Mill 47158