CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock

on 2003-02-19 23:08:47 UTC
Jeff, listen to Tim and Dave!!!!! Hook up to any 2 of the coils you've
found by the continuity tests and go for it. Label each wire and make
a table of results. You are not going to hurt that big stepper
(unless your drive is blown). Play with all combinations of the coils
(if you are trying to go full coil). They will either work or sit
there humming. I wasted too much time being over cautious my self. I
could see the need for caution if these were delicate small motors
and you had a 7amp drive.

Those bridgeport stepper motors could take pulse up to 160vdc and
about 7amps with the orig BP drives. The 160vdc got the motor coil
quickly up to current, then the supply backed off to about 12vdc to
maintain the current. Increased slew-rate.

-Lee

> Hi Jeff,
>
> go for half winding. leave 2 coils un-used. make sure the ends are
> isolated from each other, no two wires touching, wire nuts and tape.
>
> If it don't spin, switch a pair for a pair.
>
> once you see it spin, you'll see how simple it is.
>
> Search the list for 8 wire steppers, do it with google as described
> in the files section, if you feel like you want more data.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "washcomp <jeff@w...>"
> <jeff@w...> wrote:
> > I'm still fighting the battle of my unmarked NEMA 42's
> >
> > I was all set to hook them up and I got a connection diagram from
> > Superior Electric on their 8 connection stepper motors to make
sure
> I
> > got the polarity of the windings right. They show windings from
> > terminals 1-6, 2-3, 4-8 and 5-7
> >
> > I have continuity between:
> >
> > 1-6, 2-8, 4-7, 3-5
> >
> > I know that proper polarity is important and specific windings
are
> > important, but don't know how to proceed from here to identify
the
> > terminals without opening the stepper (which I understand is a no-
> no).
> >
> > Please help.
> >
> > Clueless in Brooklyn
> > Jeff
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> timg@k...
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it if
> you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
be a
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
THEM.
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Discussion Thread

washcomp <jeff@w... 2003-02-19 17:03:05 UTC Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Tim Goldstein 2003-02-19 17:07:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-02-19 20:36:01 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Jeff Goldberg 2003-02-19 20:52:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Tim Goldstein 2003-02-19 22:39:59 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Lee Studley <indigo_red@q... 2003-02-19 23:08:47 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Jeff Goldberg 2003-02-20 04:40:34 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-20 07:20:07 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-02-20 08:12:05 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Tim Goldstein 2003-02-20 08:37:27 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Jeff Goldberg 2003-02-20 10:03:20 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock turbulatordude <davemucha@j... 2003-02-20 11:57:18 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock Raymond Heckert 2003-02-21 03:09:29 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-21 03:33:25 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock jdemand@a... 2003-02-21 06:57:43 UTC Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock ballendo <ballendo@y... 2003-02-21 12:30:42 UTC A way out of a bad situation was Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock