Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Posted by
ballendo <ballendo@y...
on 2003-02-21 03:33:25 UTC
Jeff,
Good to know your persistance has resulted in this reward. Good luck
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Goldberg" <jeff@w...>
wrote:
Good to know your persistance has resulted in this reward. Good luck
Ballendo
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Goldberg" <jeff@w...>
wrote:
> First I want to thank everyone for their assistance.Superior
>
> Perseverance apparently pays off occasionally. I got a hold of a
> Electric engineer who used to work for Sigma Instruments beforeSuperior
> bought them more than twenty years ago (reason there was no mentionof Sigma
> on the web).volts DC
>
> For reference for anyone else with this problem in the future:
>
> The stepper is apparently Sigma part number: 21-4288-D200-F03
> He said it was generally run at over 100 volts so running it at 65
> is apparently fineit at no
> The rated current is 12.5 amps (he recommended for milling to run
> more than 6.25 amps in series as he said it is a slow speed-hightorque
> application) He recommended against 1/2 winding as not beneficialunless
> drivers were too smallrunning, 50
>
> The motor is rated at 1800 oz/in holding torque and 1500 oz/in
> steps/sec, 200 steps/revolutionjumpered to
>
> Now the best part:
>
> In parallel:
>
> Phase A: terminal 6 is jumpered to terminal 3, terminal 1 is
> terminal 5jumpered to
> Phase B: terminal 4 is jumpered to terminal 8, terminal 7 is
> terminal 2voltage,
>
> In series:
>
> Phase A: terminal 1, 6 is jumpered to 5, Phase A': terminal 3
> Phase B: terminal 7, 4 is jumpered to 2, Phase B': terminal 8
>
> Based on his advice, I think I'm going to raise the power supply
> cover my eyes, hold my ears and throw the switch.that's
>
> I'm always open to last minute advice before I melt this thing down!
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: turbulatordude <davemucha@j...> [mailto:davemucha@j...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:12 AM
> To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
>
>
> <snip>
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > You won't likely hurt your motor if you connect the coils
> > incorrectly. I think your motor does not match the one you have
> > documents of. So go ahead and connect it in various ways. It will
> > just sit and hum, or buzz if you get it wrong. Keep trying,
> > one of the prices of "surplus" motors<G>hook
> >
> > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Ballendo
> >
> > P.S. I think Mariss has said that you CAN hurt a DRIVE, if you
> > up an 8 wire motor incorrectly!higher
> <snip>
>
>
> 2 things, first, I think these are existing froma 120volt or
> system so if they were run at 100 volts and 8 amps, or 800 watts,ie:coil
> running them at 30 volts and 4 amps or 120 watts will show they are
> working, but not do heavy duty work.
>
> Second point is that you are correct that completely miswired
> A into coil B on the drive will cause damage. That is why I saidto
> use single coils and not mess with guessing how to use the 8 wirein
> series or parallel. besided probably half of us use only 2 coilsto
> begin with and the 3% gain is not worth the worry to a newbie.reach it if
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@a...,
> timg@k...
> Moderator: pentam@c... indigo_red@q... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
> you have trouble.be a
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to
> sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members arethere, for OT
> subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.THEM.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING
> DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
Discussion Thread
washcomp <jeff@w...
2003-02-19 17:03:05 UTC
Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-19 17:07:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-19 20:36:01 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-19 20:52:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-19 22:39:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Lee Studley <indigo_red@q...
2003-02-19 23:08:47 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-20 04:40:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-20 07:20:07 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-20 08:12:05 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-20 08:37:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-20 10:03:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-20 11:57:18 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Raymond Heckert
2003-02-21 03:09:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-21 03:33:25 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
jdemand@a...
2003-02-21 06:57:43 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-21 12:30:42 UTC
A way out of a bad situation was Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock