Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Posted by
Raymond Heckert
on 2003-02-21 03:09:29 UTC
The Bridgeport manual says: 1-6, 2-8, 3-5, 4-7. So, you have the right
polarity. I don't know why Superior says differently, unless, the above
numbering sequence is strictly for Bridgeport machines. Oh, also,the
manual says that motor direction can be reversed by interchanging terminals
#1 & #3.
RayHex
----------
polarity. I don't know why Superior says differently, unless, the above
numbering sequence is strictly for Bridgeport machines. Oh, also,the
manual says that motor direction can be reversed by interchanging terminals
#1 & #3.
RayHex
----------
> From: washcomp <jeff@...>
>
> I'm still fighting the battle of my unmarked NEMA 42's
>
> I was all set to hook them up and I got a connection diagram from
> Superior Electric on their 8 connection stepper motors to make sure I
> got the polarity of the windings right. They show windings from
> terminals 1-6, 2-3, 4-8 and 5-7
>
> I have continuity between:
>
> 1-6, 2-8, 4-7, 3-5
>
> I know that proper polarity is important and specific windings are
> important, but don't know how to proceed from here to identify the
> terminals without opening the stepper (which I understand is a no-no).
Discussion Thread
washcomp <jeff@w...
2003-02-19 17:03:05 UTC
Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-19 17:07:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-19 20:36:01 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-19 20:52:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-19 22:39:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Lee Studley <indigo_red@q...
2003-02-19 23:08:47 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-20 04:40:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-20 07:20:07 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-20 08:12:05 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Tim Goldstein
2003-02-20 08:37:27 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Jeff Goldberg
2003-02-20 10:03:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
turbulatordude <davemucha@j...
2003-02-20 11:57:18 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
Raymond Heckert
2003-02-21 03:09:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-21 03:33:25 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
jdemand@a...
2003-02-21 06:57:43 UTC
Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock
ballendo <ballendo@y...
2003-02-21 12:30:42 UTC
A way out of a bad situation was Re: Yet another NEMA 42 roadblock