Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
Posted by
CL
on 2003-03-04 14:26:16 UTC
Robert Campbell wrote:
conductive materials at all. It was because on that machine we did huge
amounts of diamond drag engraving ! The stupid diamond was non conductive !
That is what is was. The puck would otherwise work on anything else
because the Controllers "input" line for the function conected to the
puck, grounded itself thru the spindle and tooling. If you are currently
"close" to MC or had been a few years back, a company name I could
mention might ring a bell. We literally had a MC horror story. They
fixed us up as well as could be expected and I'd bet there were people
getting a good yelling at at the plant over that event !
None the less, if the *Controller software* does not have the function,
No "programable" Pendant at this level will be able to tell it to run
the routine. If it does, then the Pendant could be configured to make it
work.
Chris L
>Chris,I'm sorry Robert... Boy Am I dumb ! It wasn't because of using non
>
>All of my Multicam users use the puck.
>
>I would like the function on a pendant.
>
>
conductive materials at all. It was because on that machine we did huge
amounts of diamond drag engraving ! The stupid diamond was non conductive !
That is what is was. The puck would otherwise work on anything else
because the Controllers "input" line for the function conected to the
puck, grounded itself thru the spindle and tooling. If you are currently
"close" to MC or had been a few years back, a company name I could
mention might ring a bell. We literally had a MC horror story. They
fixed us up as well as could be expected and I'd bet there were people
getting a good yelling at at the plant over that event !
None the less, if the *Controller software* does not have the function,
No "programable" Pendant at this level will be able to tell it to run
the routine. If it does, then the Pendant could be configured to make it
work.
Chris L
Discussion Thread
Bill Blackburn
2003-03-03 17:59:49 UTC
Spindle Motor Control?
deanc500 <deancouillard@s...
2003-03-04 10:59:14 UTC
Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
Robert Campbell
2003-03-04 11:16:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
CL
2003-03-04 11:47:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
deanc500 <deancouillard@s...
2003-03-04 12:16:34 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
mayfieldtm <mayfiet@i...
2003-03-04 12:30:49 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
CL
2003-03-04 12:46:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
CL
2003-03-04 12:52:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
CL
2003-03-04 12:55:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
Robert Campbell
2003-03-04 14:04:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
ccq@x...
2003-03-04 14:24:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
CL
2003-03-04 14:26:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
Raymond Heckert
2003-03-04 19:05:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
Nigel Bailey
2003-03-05 02:13:43 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
stevenson_engineers
2003-03-05 04:08:01 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
ballendo
2003-03-05 06:26:25 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
deanc500
2003-03-05 11:42:26 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, was - Spindle Motor Control?
ballendo
2003-03-05 22:45:46 UTC
Re: Pendant Design, Dumb type