Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Posted by
JanRwl@A...
on 2003-03-23 12:46:21 UTC
In a message dated 3/22/2003 10:29:53 PM Central Standard Time,
xyz@... writes:
vote for NOT permitting the word "common" to be silk-screened alone on PCB's,
and if used ANYWHERE in "electronics" it should have AT LEAST one modifier
such as "-", "+", "LOGIC-", or "MOTOR-". As in "+COMMON", OR "LOGIC COMMON",
etc. ! ! !
Someone may be getting ready to squawl, "OFF TOPIC", but this is a VERY valid
consideration, and it is GOOD to see it discussed here!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
xyz@... writes:
> I expect my 45 years in electronics simply are not enough to understand whyI must concur with Hans! And I have been about this for as long, as well! I
> the DATA SHEET labels the connection as +5V and the Silk Screen Printing
> says COMMON....
> In my world ( I may be alone) when a connection is labeled COMMON, it
> implies Ground. Otherwise the term COMMON would be qualified with some
> other explanation.
vote for NOT permitting the word "common" to be silk-screened alone on PCB's,
and if used ANYWHERE in "electronics" it should have AT LEAST one modifier
such as "-", "+", "LOGIC-", or "MOTOR-". As in "+COMMON", OR "LOGIC COMMON",
etc. ! ! !
Someone may be getting ready to squawl, "OFF TOPIC", but this is a VERY valid
consideration, and it is GOOD to see it discussed here!
Jan Rowland
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
ja_erickson
2003-03-22 06:41:06 UTC
question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 07:39:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Monte Westlund
2003-03-22 08:18:09 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Tim Goldstein
2003-03-22 09:35:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-22 10:25:10 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 20:28:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 20:47:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
RichD
2003-03-22 21:23:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-23 05:40:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 12:33:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 12:46:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 13:43:49 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 14:19:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Andrew Mawson
2003-03-23 14:48:30 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 15:08:12 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Jon Elson
2003-03-23 17:28:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 21:29:36 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Jon Elson
2003-03-24 08:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-24 10:13:52 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
wanliker@a...
2003-03-24 18:21:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-24 20:52:26 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
turbulatordude
2003-03-25 05:11:54 UTC
Re: question for Mariss