Re: question for Mariss
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2003-03-23 21:29:36 UTC
Jon,
They are very nice indeed until you look at the on / off time specs,
usually 50uS to 100us.
These devices are meant for 60Hz zero-crossing applications and the
timing specs reflect that.
Back to the Schottky bridge scheme as a result.
Mariss
They are very nice indeed until you look at the on / off time specs,
usually 50uS to 100us.
These devices are meant for 60Hz zero-crossing applications and the
timing specs reflect that.
Back to the Schottky bridge scheme as a result.
Mariss
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
>
>
> JanRwl@A... wrote:
>
> >In a message dated 3/23/2003 3:45:21 PM Central Standard Time,
> >mariss92705@y... writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Math seems OK to you?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Thanks, Mariss, but I was unaware of Silicon diodes with only 0.3
drop, and
> >Germanium (0.2 V) seems to have fallen from favor for such low-
voltage-drop
> >purposes---or, have I just gotten SO far out of touch there is no
hope,
> >anymore!
> >
> >So, there would have to be FOUR (if TINY) diodes added for this,
or is a
> >"bridge rectifier" with only total 0.6 V. drop available, now, in
SMT
> >package????????? I guess the teens into electronics, now, are
> >unintimidated by all this TINY SMT stuff, and it IS beautiful to
behold, but
> >for us OLDE folkes, WHEW ! ! ! ! !
> >
> >
> No, there are "AC" opto-couplers that have two LEDs connected in
parallel,
> with one reversed. Therefore, one will conduct on either polarity,
and
> light
> will shine on the phototransistor. They are usually used with
circuits to
> detect the presence of some AC voltage, but can also be used to
operate off
> either polarity of DC signal. Using this type of device, there are
no extra
> diodes to add, and no voltage drop from the diodes. This is almost
> certainly
> cheaper than adding components externally.
>
> Jon
Discussion Thread
ja_erickson
2003-03-22 06:41:06 UTC
question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 07:39:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Monte Westlund
2003-03-22 08:18:09 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Tim Goldstein
2003-03-22 09:35:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-22 10:25:10 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 20:28:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-22 20:47:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
RichD
2003-03-22 21:23:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Hans Wedemeyer
2003-03-23 05:40:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 12:33:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 12:46:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
William Scalione
2003-03-23 13:03:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 13:43:49 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
JanRwl@A...
2003-03-23 14:19:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Andrew Mawson
2003-03-23 14:48:30 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 15:08:12 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Jon Elson
2003-03-23 17:28:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-23 21:29:36 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
Jon Elson
2003-03-24 08:30:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-24 10:13:52 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
wanliker@a...
2003-03-24 18:21:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] question for Mariss
Mariss Freimanis
2003-03-24 20:52:26 UTC
Re: question for Mariss
turbulatordude
2003-03-25 05:11:54 UTC
Re: question for Mariss