Re: code generation?
Posted by
doug98105
on 2003-04-06 21:57:53 UTC
Chris,
What I meant was, I think everybody should know and understand
what's involved in programming before they buy CAM. I don't mean
you should actually program difficult tool paths by hand, you should
certainly be capable of doing it, given the time and patience,
though.
I don't see anything "hard" about hand coding a true-type font.
Tedious, yes, hard no. Convert to vector format, explode the
character in CAD and follow the path, just a bunch of G01, 02, 03.
Pretty basic CNC 101 stuff.
Doug
What I meant was, I think everybody should know and understand
what's involved in programming before they buy CAM. I don't mean
you should actually program difficult tool paths by hand, you should
certainly be capable of doing it, given the time and patience,
though.
I don't see anything "hard" about hand coding a true-type font.
Tedious, yes, hard no. Convert to vector format, explode the
character in CAD and follow the path, just a bunch of G01, 02, 03.
Pretty basic CNC 101 stuff.
Doug
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Chris L <datac@l...> wrote:
>
>
> doug98105 wrote:
>
> >Group,
> >
> >Just my opinion here, but I don't think a hobbyist should buy any
> >CAM program until they can program "long-hand" in their sleep.
> >
> >I may be mistaken, but I get the impression (from previous posts)
> >that some hobbyists are buying CAM software because they don't
know
> >how to program their machines.
> >
> Well, I dont know about you, but even when I'm awake, I'd find it
pretty
> hard to make handwritten code for any "word" in true type text,
not to
> mention all different types of text. 3d RC fuselages and Car
bodies
> would likely be a pain too !
>
> Let us get "cam" FIRST,,, please??? :-)
>
> Chris L
Discussion Thread
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-05 22:01:58 UTC
code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 01:02:59 UTC
Re: code generation?
Greg Pettengill
2003-04-06 09:43:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 09:51:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Fred Smith
2003-04-06 10:08:40 UTC
Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-06 10:11:35 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 10:25:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-04-06 11:51:08 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 12:06:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-06 15:12:12 UTC
Re: code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 15:39:01 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-06 18:02:44 UTC
Re: code generation?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-04-06 19:34:08 UTC
Re: code generation?
Chris L
2003-04-06 20:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Chris L
2003-04-06 20:59:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-06 21:57:53 UTC
Re: code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 23:58:39 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tony Jeffree
2003-04-07 02:29:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-07 06:41:20 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 07:39:03 UTC
Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-07 09:11:48 UTC
Re: code generation?
Fred Smith
2003-04-07 11:01:29 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 11:32:03 UTC
Re: code generation?
James Cullins
2003-04-07 11:52:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
CL
2003-04-07 12:38:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
turbulatordude
2003-04-07 12:42:10 UTC
Re: code generation? - hand coding
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 12:46:36 UTC
Re: code generation?
James Cullins
2003-04-07 14:28:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Mike
2003-04-07 16:07:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Mark Thomas
2003-04-07 21:21:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
CL
2003-04-08 05:57:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
sparkness2001
2003-04-08 10:43:38 UTC
Re: code generation?