Re: code generation?
Posted by
Brian Sherwood
on 2003-04-07 11:32:03 UTC
Yer welcome. Let me guess--"Z0.10" lifts the endmill .100" [assuming
the machine in question regards 'up' as increment-z and not
decrement-z] at the end of thelast cut so it doesn't try to trench the
workpiece during the rapid-traverse return-to-home, right?
Such is the price i pay for using CAM-generated code from a quick .dxf
sketch with thickness=0.
Is there one book, a 'for dummies' or something, that pulled together
the basics of CADCAM in one resource? I've concluded
information-overload is the single biggest problem here...with demos
of 12 or 13 different things on my 'puter at once, too many choices...
thanks
Lurch
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "doug98105"
<dougrasmussen@c...> wrote:
the machine in question regards 'up' as increment-z and not
decrement-z] at the end of thelast cut so it doesn't try to trench the
workpiece during the rapid-traverse return-to-home, right?
Such is the price i pay for using CAM-generated code from a quick .dxf
sketch with thickness=0.
Is there one book, a 'for dummies' or something, that pulled together
the basics of CADCAM in one resource? I've concluded
information-overload is the single biggest problem here...with demos
of 12 or 13 different things on my 'puter at once, too many choices...
thanks
Lurch
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "doug98105"
<dougrasmussen@c...> wrote:
> Very clever!!!
>
> But to save you from a broken endmill let me "HAND-CODE" a fix to
> your CAM generated Gcode.
>
> Add "Z0.10" to the end of line N010.
> add N015 G01 Z-.10 F5.0
> add N025 G00 Z0.10
> add N035 G01 Z-.10 F5.0
> add N045 G00 Z0.10
> add N055 G01 Z-.10 F5.0
> add N070 G00 Z0.10
>
> thanks for the laugh,
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Sherwood"
> <lurch@t...> wrote:
>
> (snip)
>
> > to which I say
> > N10 G00 X4.1291 Y6.8767
> > N20 G03 X4.1291 Y6.8767 I-0.6571 J0.0000 F10.0
> > N30 G00 X7.5848 Y6.9047
> > N40 G03 X7.5848 Y6.9047 I-0.6571 J0.0000 F10.0
> > N50 G00 X3.4407 Y5.4437
> > N60 G03 X6.9315 Y5.4437 I1.7454 J0.1141 F10.0
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "doug98105"
> > <dougrasmussen@c...> wrote:
> > > Chris,
> > >
> > > What I meant was, I think everybody should know and understand
> > > what's involved in programming before they buy CAM. I don't
> mean
> > > you should actually program difficult tool paths by hand, you
> should
> > > certainly be capable of doing it, given the time and patience,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > I don't see anything "hard" about hand coding a true-type font.
> > > Tedious, yes, hard no. Convert to vector format, explode the
> > > character in CAD and follow the path, just a bunch of G01, 02,
> 03.
> > > Pretty basic CNC 101 stuff.
> > >
> > > Doug
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Chris L <datac@l...>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > doug98105 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Group,
> > > > >
> > > > >Just my opinion here, but I don't think a hobbyist should buy
> any
> > > > >CAM program until they can program "long-hand" in their sleep.
> > > > >
> > > > >I may be mistaken, but I get the impression (from previous
> posts)
> > > > >that some hobbyists are buying CAM software because they
> don't
> > > know
> > > > >how to program their machines.
> > > > >
> > > > Well, I dont know about you, but even when I'm awake, I'd find
> it
> > > pretty
> > > > hard to make handwritten code for any "word" in true type
> text,
> > > not to
> > > > mention all different types of text. 3d RC fuselages and Car
> > > bodies
> > > > would likely be a pain too !
> > > >
> > > > Let us get "cam" FIRST,,, please??? :-)
> > > >
> > > > Chris L
Discussion Thread
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-05 22:01:58 UTC
code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 01:02:59 UTC
Re: code generation?
Greg Pettengill
2003-04-06 09:43:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 09:51:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Fred Smith
2003-04-06 10:08:40 UTC
Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-06 10:11:35 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 10:25:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-04-06 11:51:08 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tim Goldstein
2003-04-06 12:06:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-06 15:12:12 UTC
Re: code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 15:39:01 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-06 18:02:44 UTC
Re: code generation?
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2003-04-06 19:34:08 UTC
Re: code generation?
Chris L
2003-04-06 20:46:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Chris L
2003-04-06 20:59:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-06 21:57:53 UTC
Re: code generation?
stevenson_engineers
2003-04-06 23:58:39 UTC
Re: code generation?
Tony Jeffree
2003-04-07 02:29:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-07 06:41:20 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 07:39:03 UTC
Re: code generation?
doug98105
2003-04-07 09:11:48 UTC
Re: code generation?
Fred Smith
2003-04-07 11:01:29 UTC
Re: code generation?
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 11:32:03 UTC
Re: code generation?
James Cullins
2003-04-07 11:52:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
CL
2003-04-07 12:38:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
turbulatordude
2003-04-07 12:42:10 UTC
Re: code generation? - hand coding
Brian Sherwood
2003-04-07 12:46:36 UTC
Re: code generation?
James Cullins
2003-04-07 14:28:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Mike
2003-04-07 16:07:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
Mark Thomas
2003-04-07 21:21:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
CL
2003-04-08 05:57:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: code generation?
sparkness2001
2003-04-08 10:43:38 UTC
Re: code generation?