Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
Posted by
jeffalanp
on 2003-06-09 11:12:42 UTC
Hi Dave,
With a level playing feild, I don't think there would be much of a
difference between 1/8 and 1/10 stepping modes. As Alan pointed out,
the Gecko does have the mid-band instability factor taken into
account, which the Allegro chips do not. This certainy could be an
issue, but many people run their CNC mini-mills without the
compensation (Xylotex and other uncompensated drives) with no
problems.
When it comes down to $$$, for the lower power requirements CNC
machine range, I (biased opinion) beleive the Xylotex stack up nicely
to the Geckos.
Jeff
http://www.xylotex.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turbulatordude"
<davemucha@j...> wrote:
With a level playing feild, I don't think there would be much of a
difference between 1/8 and 1/10 stepping modes. As Alan pointed out,
the Gecko does have the mid-band instability factor taken into
account, which the Allegro chips do not. This certainy could be an
issue, but many people run their CNC mini-mills without the
compensation (Xylotex and other uncompensated drives) with no
problems.
When it comes down to $$$, for the lower power requirements CNC
machine range, I (biased opinion) beleive the Xylotex stack up nicely
to the Geckos.
Jeff
http://www.xylotex.com
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "turbulatordude"
<davemucha@j...> wrote:
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "jeffalanp" <xylotex@h...>both
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> > I don't think Luis specified his voltage. If he *was* running
> at
> > 30V or below, then yes, the Xylotex would probably be just as
> > effective (when using a good fan) as the Gecko, since they are
> > microstepping bipolar drives
>
> This was my point. it is unfair to test one mill at 30 volts and
> another at 70 volts and then point to the drivers as the difference.
>
> if the playing field is level, in this senario, 2 amps as 30 volts,
> how do the contenders stack up ?
>
> the Gecko being a 10x microstepping and the Xylotex being a 8x
>
>
> Dave
Discussion Thread
luisguillermo98
2003-06-08 05:21:36 UTC
XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
turbulatordude
2003-06-08 06:34:31 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
jeffalanp
2003-06-08 10:14:16 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
Torsten
2003-06-08 11:23:29 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
turbulatordude
2003-06-08 16:48:21 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
jeffalanp
2003-06-08 18:06:19 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
Kim Lux
2003-06-08 18:34:54 UTC
Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
David A. Frantz
2003-06-08 19:17:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-06-08 19:27:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
William Scalione
2003-06-08 19:46:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
Kim Lux
2003-06-09 06:36:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
turbulatordude
2003-06-09 06:57:24 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
jeffalanp
2003-06-09 11:12:42 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
luisguillermo98
2003-06-10 17:11:01 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
Tim Goldstein
2003-06-10 17:35:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
jeffalanp
2003-06-10 18:43:47 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
luisguillermo98
2003-06-10 18:55:21 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
jeffalanp
2003-06-10 19:41:58 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ??
turbulatordude
2003-06-10 20:30:01 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
William Scalione
2003-06-11 06:23:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
Kim Lux
2003-06-11 06:31:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
Ed Fanta
2003-06-11 06:36:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
Jon Elson
2003-06-11 09:54:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Servo motor torque curves and duty cycle info
luisguillermo98
2003-06-11 18:16:09 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Peter Homann
2003-06-11 19:04:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Mark Thomas
2003-06-11 19:06:02 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-06-11 19:59:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Mark Thomas
2003-06-11 20:20:09 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-06-11 21:04:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Jon Elson
2003-06-11 21:49:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-06-12 04:22:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
luisguillermo98
2003-06-12 19:29:31 UTC
Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Statman Designs, LLC
2003-06-12 22:40:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Mark Thomas
2003-06-23 15:45:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?
Russ Waters
2003-06-25 04:22:04 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: XYLOTEX VS GECKO DRIVE ?? why ?