Re: Question? UCN5804
Posted by
Paul Alciatore
on 2003-07-31 13:30:57 UTC
I've worked in electronmics for over 30 years. Most electronic
circuits do not need 1% or even 2% tolerances. Many power resistors
are 10% or envn 20% tolerance. If it calls for a 5K Ohm, 5 W
resistor, I'm sure a 5.1K (a +2% increase over 5K) would work equally
well. If I were creating a higher wattage resistor by paralleling 5
1W ones, I would definitely use five of the same value. Five 5.1K,
1W resistors in parallel would work very well and the currents
through them would be better balanced. And besides, the resistors
you are buying are likely 10% tolerance anyway. That means their
actual values are between 4.59K and 5.61K. Heck, 5 4.7Ks would work
quite well.
These loose tolerances are why they put trimmer pots in many
electronic circuits.
Another good source for electronic components is Newark Electronics.
They're a lot older than Digi-Key and carry or can get almost
everything. www.newark.com
Paul A.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Harvey White <madyn@i...>
wrote:
circuits do not need 1% or even 2% tolerances. Many power resistors
are 10% or envn 20% tolerance. If it calls for a 5K Ohm, 5 W
resistor, I'm sure a 5.1K (a +2% increase over 5K) would work equally
well. If I were creating a higher wattage resistor by paralleling 5
1W ones, I would definitely use five of the same value. Five 5.1K,
1W resistors in parallel would work very well and the currents
through them would be better balanced. And besides, the resistors
you are buying are likely 10% tolerance anyway. That means their
actual values are between 4.59K and 5.61K. Heck, 5 4.7Ks would work
quite well.
These loose tolerances are why they put trimmer pots in many
electronic circuits.
Another good source for electronic components is Newark Electronics.
They're a lot older than Digi-Key and carry or can get almost
everything. www.newark.com
Paul A.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Harvey White <madyn@i...>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 05:03:25 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:making my
>
> >On Tue Jul 1 21:40:34 2003 ben_englund wrote:
> >
> >>> > > From: k00lmon <k00lmon@y...>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm trying to learn how to operate a stepper motor by
> >>ownby
> >>> > > circuit. I have read through "The Robot Builder's Bonanza"
> >>Gordoncontrol a
> >>> > > McComb and found a circuit utilizing a UCN5804 IC to
> >>> > > stepper motor. What I don't understand is that the circuithas
> >>> > > resistor components that were indicated as 2 to 5 watts at1K!
> >>Wherehow to
> >>> > > do I find 2 watts resistors? Is it easier for me to learn
> >>> > > control a stepper motor by just buying a kit? Are there anymotors
> >>kits out
> >>> > > there that teaches u the basics of controlling stepper
> >>thatgetting
> >>> > > anyone could recommend? Thanks for reading.
> >>
> >>Radio shack used to carry 2 watt resistors but I see they are
> >>away from components lately. Kind of sad... Should still be ableto
> >>buy them on the web site or through the catalog though. Or orderday
> >>from Digi-Key, they are real good. I get small orders the next
> >>and free shipping. Hope this helps.resistors,
> >>
> >>
> >>Ben Englund
> >
> >Or, you can make a 5 Watt, 1K resistor, by taking five 1 Watt, 1K
> >and soldering them in parallel with each other.1
>
> No, you can't.
>
> You end up with a 200 ohm resistor.
>
> Do this with 4 5.1K ohm resistors and 1 4.7 k resistors. That will
> get you as close as you can get. Each of the resistors needs to be
> watt. The 4.7 K resistor will get fractionally warmer.about
>
> (You end up 400 plus and 300 minus, which when averaged out, is
> 20 ohms plus. close enough)
>
>
> Must have been really early for you. <grin>
>
> Harvey
>
>
> >
> >Bill
Discussion Thread
k00lmon
2003-06-16 21:26:30 UTC
Question? UCN5804
stephank97
2003-06-17 01:08:05 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
James Stevens
2003-06-17 06:23:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question? UCN5804
Raymond Heckert
2003-06-17 21:05:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question? UCN5804
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-06-18 10:36:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Question? UCN5804
ben_englund
2003-07-02 00:18:32 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
ccq@x...
2003-07-02 05:01:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
Harvey White
2003-07-02 06:13:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
Carl Mikkelsen
2003-07-02 06:33:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
ccq@x...
2003-07-02 07:06:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
turbulatordude
2003-07-02 07:09:59 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
Eric Rullens
2003-07-02 07:58:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2003-07-02 10:47:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
turbulatordude
2003-07-02 11:58:29 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
Richard
2003-07-02 13:50:16 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
chrlythb@a...
2003-07-02 18:10:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
JanRwl@A...
2003-07-02 19:21:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
turbulatordude
2003-07-02 20:21:28 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
Bill Kichman
2003-07-03 10:13:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
JanRwl@A...
2003-07-03 11:27:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Question? UCN5804
turbulatordude
2003-07-03 16:05:00 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804
Paul Alciatore
2003-07-31 13:30:57 UTC
Re: Question? UCN5804