Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Posted by
vavaroutsos
on 2003-10-29 20:02:10 UTC
Mariss, if you want to start using FPGAs, I would suggest you learn a
hardware description language like Verilog of VHDL (what I prefer)
and get Synplicity (www.synplicity.com). It's the best synthesis tool
for the money and beats many more expensive packages. You can then
design your FPGAs independent of FPGA architecture, sythesize for a
particular FPGA architecture, then run the place and route tool
provided by the FPGA vendor to finish the job. Altera offers a free
version of their tools on their website that handles all but the
latest and largest parts. I'm not sure if Xilinx has a free version.
Best Regards,
~petev
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
<mariss92705@y...> wrote:
hardware description language like Verilog of VHDL (what I prefer)
and get Synplicity (www.synplicity.com). It's the best synthesis tool
for the money and beats many more expensive packages. You can then
design your FPGAs independent of FPGA architecture, sythesize for a
particular FPGA architecture, then run the place and route tool
provided by the FPGA vendor to finish the job. Altera offers a free
version of their tools on their website that handles all but the
latest and largest parts. I'm not sure if Xilinx has a free version.
Best Regards,
~petev
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Mariss Freimanis"
<mariss92705@y...> wrote:
> Jon,ground.
>
> 1) Do not use the HCPL-2530. It's gain is only 9%.
>
> 2) Do not use a 74HC part as a buffer. It's only good for +4/-8mA.
> Use 74AC parts; they are good for +/-24mA. Same pinouts (7414 =
> 74HC14 = 74AC14).
>
> 3) Meant as written. ENC+ (+5VDC) is also the virtual analog
> This makes it a node, meaning current flows into and out of it. Ifthe
> current flows into it (from internal analog circuits), it causes
> node voltage to rise above the regulated +5VDC. A 470 ohm resistormachine
> ensures that can't happen; the encoder load normally takes care of
> that.
>
> 4) It is symmetrical. Your brushes may have set in a direction. Run
> the motor a few hours in the opposite direction and try again.
>
> 5) PID tracking is an unecessary luxury for this price drive. The
> drive is tuned for a particular system power supply that normally
> will not change over the service life of the system. That leaves
> ripple voltage which is an insignificant second-order effect.
>
> 6) Fine-pitch placement requires machine vision. This slows a
> down from 15,000 parts / hr to about 3,000 / hr. and we have athat
> Zevatech FS740 for that. I try to avoid fine-pitch packages for
> reason; time is money.use
>
> Whose FPGAs are you using? Xilinx? I ask because I'm learning to
> their 9500 series CPDLs which I will eventually use to replace the
> SOIC glue logic in all our drives.
>
> 7) Eliminate the D term by turning the DAMP trimpot full CCW.
> Eliminating the I term requires shorting an 0805 capacitor.
>
> Mariss
Discussion Thread
Jon Elson
2003-10-28 23:01:10 UTC
Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-29 06:01:37 UTC
Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Linc Reed-Nickerson
2003-10-29 07:29:08 UTC
Tapered Threads?
Jon Elson
2003-10-29 10:25:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Alan Rothenbush
2003-10-29 10:39:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Mariss Freimanis
2003-10-29 11:20:50 UTC
Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Maddock Machine
2003-10-29 11:44:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tapered Threads?
doug98105
2003-10-29 17:13:14 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads?
vavaroutsos
2003-10-29 20:02:10 UTC
Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Jon Elson
2003-10-29 23:10:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Update on closed-loop to the computer with Gecko 320
Kim Lux
2003-10-29 23:21:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tapered Threads?
rotarysmp
2003-10-30 03:53:55 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Miroslav Pejic
2003-10-30 05:01:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Raymond Heckert
2003-10-30 21:12:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tapered Threads?
rotarysmp
2003-10-31 02:24:58 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads? TurboCNC encoder setups.
Kim Lux
2003-10-31 07:46:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
rotarysmp
2003-11-01 13:13:04 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Paul
2003-11-01 16:10:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Jon Elson
2003-11-01 22:48:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
rotarysmp
2003-11-03 01:56:52 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
jmkasunich
2003-11-03 06:30:18 UTC
Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Kim Lux
2003-11-03 07:48:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Kim Lux
2003-11-03 07:48:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Jon Elson
2003-11-03 10:00:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Kim Lux
2003-11-03 10:19:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Tony Jeffree
2003-11-03 10:40:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes
Kim Lux
2003-11-03 11:51:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tapered Threads? Kim's TurboCNC codes