CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question

on 2003-12-10 17:27:51 UTC
Yes, most of the modern ones are. Hydraulically actuated wih position and
rate feedback.

D.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mariss Freimanis" <mariss92705@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question


> Aren't ful motion flight-simulators hexapods?
>
> Mariss
>
> --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Tim" <luvindaddy@y...> wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> > Can someone answer this stupid question for me????
> > What would be the need for a hexapod machine anyway?
> > I think it is cool & would probably build one myself if I had the
> > time, but can't seem to figure out a use for one??? haha!!
> > Any Ideas?
> > Thanks, Tim Bostic
> >
> > --- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Ray Henry <rehenry@u...>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jon Elson <elson@p...>
> > > > Subject: Re: Hexapod question
> > > >
> > > > Simon M. Arthur wrote:
> > > > >I've started building a hexapod on the cheap. Some photos:
> > > > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/hexapod-portrait-reduced.jpg
> > > > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/dscf0011-reduced.jpg
> > > > >
> > > > >I noticed that the platform can be rotated and tilted more or
> > less
> > > > >freely, even with power going to the steppers. Translational
> > movement
> > > > > is a lot harder. This makes me think that I misunderstood
> > completely
> > > > > how a hexapod is supposed to work. I have a universal joint
> on
> > the
> > > > > frame so that the motor can tilt, and another on the platform.
> > > > >
> > > > >Can this setup be made to work? Why doesn't my hexapod lock the
> > > > > platform in place?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The only way a hexapod (Stewart platform) maintains alignment
> of
> > the
> > > > platform
> > > > is by controlling the lengths of all 6 struts in a coordinated
> > way.
> > > > EMC can drive a hexapod, but it doesn't really allow tilting
> of
> > the
> > > > platform. But, you can translate the platform in 3 cartesian
> > > > coordinates rather nicely.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Jon, Simon
> > >
> > > As of a while ago, the EMC motion planner can tilt the hexapod's
> > platform.
> > > Till Franitza in Stuttgart has been doing this with his desktop
> > models.
> > > You can see both stepper and servo version photos and a movie at
> > >
> > > http://www.isw.uni-
> stuttgart.de/personen/t_franit/modell/index.html
> > >
> > > There is some pretty novel work on platform geometry with Model 2
> > where
> > > three of the the struts interact with the three other struts
> rather
> > than
> > > with the platform itself. This allows for a much larger angle of
> > tilt
> > > before the system approaches a singularity.
> > >
> > > If your German conprehension is as poor as mine, there is a
> Queen's
> > > English version that can be reached by clicking on the Brit flag.
> > >
> > > Ray
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if
you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a
sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT
subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM.
DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 06:56:50 UTC Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-09 09:40:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-09 11:37:45 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-09 11:45:25 UTC Re: Hexapod question Kevin Martin 2003-12-09 13:23:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 21:55:33 UTC Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 21:55:34 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-10 05:07:25 UTC Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-10 05:43:54 UTC Re: Hexapod question Asim Khan 2003-12-10 06:32:58 UTC EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec] Tim 2003-12-10 08:38:43 UTC Re: Hexapod question Madhu Annapragada 2003-12-10 09:13:24 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Mariss Freimanis 2003-12-10 10:03:33 UTC Re: Hexapod question Carl Mikkelsen 2003-12-10 10:38:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 10:59:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Chuck Knight 2003-12-10 11:00:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 11:03:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Chuck Knight 2003-12-10 11:47:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Carl Mikkelsen 2003-12-10 13:10:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question industrialhobbies 2003-12-10 14:08:30 UTC Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 14:59:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec] Graham Stabler 2003-12-10 15:31:11 UTC Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-10 15:34:45 UTC Re: Hexapod question Paul 2003-12-10 16:42:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Richard L. Wurdack 2003-12-10 17:27:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Harvey White 2003-12-10 18:45:58 UTC Re: [cad-cam] [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-10 19:07:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-10 22:43:36 UTC Re: Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-11 03:55:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-11 06:52:18 UTC Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question alex 2003-12-11 07:32:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-11 11:48:35 UTC Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-11 14:43:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question Kevin Martin 2003-12-11 16:18:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question afaIII 2003-12-11 18:12:22 UTC Re: Hexapod question (joints) alex 2003-12-11 18:37:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-11 19:11:43 UTC Re: Hexapod question Raymond Heckert 2003-12-11 20:46:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question industrialhobbies 2003-12-11 21:09:05 UTC Re: Hexapod question (joints) Don Rogers 2003-12-11 23:11:54 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-12 02:29:01 UTC Re: Hexapod question Indy123456 2003-12-12 05:18:32 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:41:38 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:22 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:31 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:55 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:56 UTC Re: Hexapod question afaIII 2003-12-12 07:31:08 UTC Re: Hexapod question Raymond Heckert 2003-12-12 18:07:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-13 06:56:21 UTC Re: Re: Hexapod question cadcracker@l... 2003-12-13 12:49:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Dave Dillabough 2003-12-15 13:24:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question doug98105 2003-12-15 16:23:07 UTC Re: Hexapod question