CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [cad-cam] [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question

Posted by Harvey White
on 2003-12-10 18:45:58 UTC
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:27:43 -0000, you wrote:

>Hello everyone,
>Can someone answer this stupid question for me????
>What would be the need for a hexapod machine anyway?
>I think it is cool & would probably build one myself if I had the
>time, but can't seem to figure out a use for one??? haha!!
>Any Ideas?

Think of how many different ways you can move the tool, up, down, in
at any particular angle, left, right, etc.

Now imagine what you'd have to build to get this to work with a
conventional setup. I'd think 4 axis, if not 5 or more....


The advantage here is that all the axis setups are identical.

Harvey


>Thanks, Tim Bostic
>
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Ray Henry <rehenry@u...>
>wrote:
>>
>> > From: Jon Elson <elson@p...>
>> > Subject: Re: Hexapod question
>> >
>> > Simon M. Arthur wrote:
>> > >I've started building a hexapod on the cheap. Some photos:
>> > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/hexapod-portrait-reduced.jpg
>> > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/dscf0011-reduced.jpg
>> > >
>> > >I noticed that the platform can be rotated and tilted more or
>less
>> > >freely, even with power going to the steppers. Translational
>movement
>> > > is a lot harder. This makes me think that I misunderstood
>completely
>> > > how a hexapod is supposed to work. I have a universal joint on
>the
>> > > frame so that the motor can tilt, and another on the platform.
>> > >
>> > >Can this setup be made to work? Why doesn't my hexapod lock the
>> > > platform in place?
>> > >
>> >
>> > The only way a hexapod (Stewart platform) maintains alignment of
>the
>> > platform
>> > is by controlling the lengths of all 6 struts in a coordinated
>way.
>> > EMC can drive a hexapod, but it doesn't really allow tilting of
>the
>> > platform. But, you can translate the platform in 3 cartesian
>> > coordinates rather nicely.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Jon, Simon
>>
>> As of a while ago, the EMC motion planner can tilt the hexapod's
>platform.
>> Till Franitza in Stuttgart has been doing this with his desktop
>models.
>> You can see both stepper and servo version photos and a movie at
>>
>> http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de/personen/t_franit/modell/index.html
>>
>> There is some pretty novel work on platform geometry with Model 2
>where
>> three of the the struts interact with the three other struts rather
>than
>> with the platform itself. This allows for a much larger angle of
>tilt
>> before the system approaches a singularity.
>>
>> If your German conprehension is as poor as mine, there is a Queen's
>> English version that can be reached by clicking on the Brit flag.
>>
>> Ray
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>

Discussion Thread

Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 06:56:50 UTC Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-09 09:40:28 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-09 11:37:45 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-09 11:45:25 UTC Re: Hexapod question Kevin Martin 2003-12-09 13:23:54 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 21:55:33 UTC Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-09 21:55:34 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-10 05:07:25 UTC Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-10 05:43:54 UTC Re: Hexapod question Asim Khan 2003-12-10 06:32:58 UTC EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec] Tim 2003-12-10 08:38:43 UTC Re: Hexapod question Madhu Annapragada 2003-12-10 09:13:24 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Mariss Freimanis 2003-12-10 10:03:33 UTC Re: Hexapod question Carl Mikkelsen 2003-12-10 10:38:13 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 10:59:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Chuck Knight 2003-12-10 11:00:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 11:03:17 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Chuck Knight 2003-12-10 11:47:04 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Carl Mikkelsen 2003-12-10 13:10:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question industrialhobbies 2003-12-10 14:08:30 UTC Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-10 14:59:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec] Graham Stabler 2003-12-10 15:31:11 UTC Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-10 15:34:45 UTC Re: Hexapod question Paul 2003-12-10 16:42:46 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Richard L. Wurdack 2003-12-10 17:27:51 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Harvey White 2003-12-10 18:45:58 UTC Re: [cad-cam] [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Simon M. Arthur 2003-12-10 19:07:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-10 22:43:36 UTC Re: Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-11 03:55:25 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-11 06:52:18 UTC Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question alex 2003-12-11 07:32:39 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-11 11:48:35 UTC Re: Hexapod question Jon Elson 2003-12-11 14:43:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question Kevin Martin 2003-12-11 16:18:35 UTC RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question afaIII 2003-12-11 18:12:22 UTC Re: Hexapod question (joints) alex 2003-12-11 18:37:32 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-11 19:11:43 UTC Re: Hexapod question Raymond Heckert 2003-12-11 20:46:06 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question industrialhobbies 2003-12-11 21:09:05 UTC Re: Hexapod question (joints) Don Rogers 2003-12-11 23:11:54 UTC Re: Hexapod question Graham Stabler 2003-12-12 02:29:01 UTC Re: Hexapod question Indy123456 2003-12-12 05:18:32 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:41:38 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:22 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:31 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:55 UTC Re: Hexapod question ballendo 2003-12-12 06:42:56 UTC Re: Hexapod question afaIII 2003-12-12 07:31:08 UTC Re: Hexapod question Raymond Heckert 2003-12-12 18:07:07 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Ray Henry 2003-12-13 06:56:21 UTC Re: Re: Hexapod question cadcracker@l... 2003-12-13 12:49:33 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question Dave Dillabough 2003-12-15 13:24:20 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question doug98105 2003-12-15 16:23:07 UTC Re: Hexapod question