Re: [cad-cam] [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Posted by
Harvey White
on 2003-12-10 18:45:58 UTC
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:27:43 -0000, you wrote:
at any particular angle, left, right, etc.
Now imagine what you'd have to build to get this to work with a
conventional setup. I'd think 4 axis, if not 5 or more....
The advantage here is that all the axis setups are identical.
Harvey
>Hello everyone,Think of how many different ways you can move the tool, up, down, in
>Can someone answer this stupid question for me????
>What would be the need for a hexapod machine anyway?
>I think it is cool & would probably build one myself if I had the
>time, but can't seem to figure out a use for one??? haha!!
>Any Ideas?
at any particular angle, left, right, etc.
Now imagine what you'd have to build to get this to work with a
conventional setup. I'd think 4 axis, if not 5 or more....
The advantage here is that all the axis setups are identical.
Harvey
>Thanks, Tim Bostic
>
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Ray Henry <rehenry@u...>
>wrote:
>>
>> > From: Jon Elson <elson@p...>
>> > Subject: Re: Hexapod question
>> >
>> > Simon M. Arthur wrote:
>> > >I've started building a hexapod on the cheap. Some photos:
>> > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/hexapod-portrait-reduced.jpg
>> > >http://www.tinyplanet.com/images/dscf0011-reduced.jpg
>> > >
>> > >I noticed that the platform can be rotated and tilted more or
>less
>> > >freely, even with power going to the steppers. Translational
>movement
>> > > is a lot harder. This makes me think that I misunderstood
>completely
>> > > how a hexapod is supposed to work. I have a universal joint on
>the
>> > > frame so that the motor can tilt, and another on the platform.
>> > >
>> > >Can this setup be made to work? Why doesn't my hexapod lock the
>> > > platform in place?
>> > >
>> >
>> > The only way a hexapod (Stewart platform) maintains alignment of
>the
>> > platform
>> > is by controlling the lengths of all 6 struts in a coordinated
>way.
>> > EMC can drive a hexapod, but it doesn't really allow tilting of
>the
>> > platform. But, you can translate the platform in 3 cartesian
>> > coordinates rather nicely.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Jon, Simon
>>
>> As of a while ago, the EMC motion planner can tilt the hexapod's
>platform.
>> Till Franitza in Stuttgart has been doing this with his desktop
>models.
>> You can see both stepper and servo version photos and a movie at
>>
>> http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de/personen/t_franit/modell/index.html
>>
>> There is some pretty novel work on platform geometry with Model 2
>where
>> three of the the struts interact with the three other struts rather
>than
>> with the platform itself. This allows for a much larger angle of
>tilt
>> before the system approaches a singularity.
>>
>> If your German conprehension is as poor as mine, there is a Queen's
>> English version that can be reached by clicking on the Brit flag.
>>
>> Ray
>
>
>Addresses:
>FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
>FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
>Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
>Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
>Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... [Moderators]
>URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
>OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
>If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
>http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
>NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
>bill
>List Mom
>List Owner
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Discussion Thread
Simon M. Arthur
2003-12-09 06:56:50 UTC
Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-09 09:40:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question
Graham Stabler
2003-12-09 11:37:45 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Graham Stabler
2003-12-09 11:45:25 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Kevin Martin
2003-12-09 13:23:54 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question
Simon M. Arthur
2003-12-09 21:55:33 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Simon M. Arthur
2003-12-09 21:55:34 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Graham Stabler
2003-12-10 05:07:25 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Ray Henry
2003-12-10 05:43:54 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Asim Khan
2003-12-10 06:32:58 UTC
EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec]
Tim
2003-12-10 08:38:43 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Madhu Annapragada
2003-12-10 09:13:24 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Mariss Freimanis
2003-12-10 10:03:33 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Carl Mikkelsen
2003-12-10 10:38:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-10 10:59:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Chuck Knight
2003-12-10 11:00:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-10 11:03:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Chuck Knight
2003-12-10 11:47:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Carl Mikkelsen
2003-12-10 13:10:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Hexapod question
industrialhobbies
2003-12-10 14:08:30 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-10 14:59:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EMC related Question G54 G55,... and use of 5241, 5242, 5243 variables [asimtec]
Graham Stabler
2003-12-10 15:31:11 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Simon M. Arthur
2003-12-10 15:34:45 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Paul
2003-12-10 16:42:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Richard L. Wurdack
2003-12-10 17:27:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Harvey White
2003-12-10 18:45:58 UTC
Re: [cad-cam] [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Simon M. Arthur
2003-12-10 19:07:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Ray Henry
2003-12-10 22:43:36 UTC
Re: Re: Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-11 03:55:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Ray Henry
2003-12-11 06:52:18 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question
alex
2003-12-11 07:32:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-11 11:48:35 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Jon Elson
2003-12-11 14:43:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question
Kevin Martin
2003-12-11 16:18:35 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
afaIII
2003-12-11 18:12:22 UTC
Re: Hexapod question (joints)
alex
2003-12-11 18:37:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Hexapod question
Graham Stabler
2003-12-11 19:11:43 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Raymond Heckert
2003-12-11 20:46:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
industrialhobbies
2003-12-11 21:09:05 UTC
Re: Hexapod question (joints)
Don Rogers
2003-12-11 23:11:54 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Graham Stabler
2003-12-12 02:29:01 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Indy123456
2003-12-12 05:18:32 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-12 06:41:38 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-12 06:42:22 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-12 06:42:31 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-12 06:42:55 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
ballendo
2003-12-12 06:42:56 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
afaIII
2003-12-12 07:31:08 UTC
Re: Hexapod question
Raymond Heckert
2003-12-12 18:07:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Ray Henry
2003-12-13 06:56:21 UTC
Re: Re: Hexapod question
cadcracker@l...
2003-12-13 12:49:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
Dave Dillabough
2003-12-15 13:24:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Hexapod question
doug98105
2003-12-15 16:23:07 UTC
Re: Hexapod question