Re: Linux EMC computer
Posted by
dakota8833
on 2004-03-28 07:01:55 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Paul <no.spam27@n...> wrote:
statement was I tried reinstalling the BDI 6 plus times one nite. The
reason for the reinstall was bootup file read errors. Also tried
another used hard drive. Funny thing ,... during bootup I noticed
error messages reporting where on the drive the problem was, (
different on the two hard drives I had ). Only after running FDISK
manually did I have success. If low level formating is the way to
detect and mark bad blocks then it must not happen with an automatic
install. Because there is a huge difference in install time, manually
partitioning and running FDISK ( get a couple cups of coffee ).
It wasn't untill days later I asked a friend of mine if he had
installed the BDI I gave him. He said he tried , didn't work and gave
up. The second hard drive ? Got it from him ,... the one he used.
My question is, if FDISK is needed and called during the automatic
install, why do you have the option NOT to use it during a manual
install. Why will a hard drive with bad blocks have problems with a
auto install and not with a manual? And why the time difference
between the two types of installs ?
Frank .,,,,,, By the way I love EMC , just questions
>partitioning
> Crap !
> Even the most brain dead installs call fdisk to carry out the
> of a hard disk. A low level format is when bad blocks are detected andsystem be it
> marked. After running fdisk, formatting is mandatory on ANY file
> NTFS, FAT16, or EXT2. Even under expert mode, the BDI installs willstill run
> a formatting program.Well I should have said " I think it doesn't ". The reason I made that
>
statement was I tried reinstalling the BDI 6 plus times one nite. The
reason for the reinstall was bootup file read errors. Also tried
another used hard drive. Funny thing ,... during bootup I noticed
error messages reporting where on the drive the problem was, (
different on the two hard drives I had ). Only after running FDISK
manually did I have success. If low level formating is the way to
detect and mark bad blocks then it must not happen with an automatic
install. Because there is a huge difference in install time, manually
partitioning and running FDISK ( get a couple cups of coffee ).
It wasn't untill days later I asked a friend of mine if he had
installed the BDI I gave him. He said he tried , didn't work and gave
up. The second hard drive ? Got it from him ,... the one he used.
My question is, if FDISK is needed and called during the automatic
install, why do you have the option NOT to use it during a manual
install. Why will a hard drive with bad blocks have problems with a
auto install and not with a manual? And why the time difference
between the two types of installs ?
Frank .,,,,,, By the way I love EMC , just questions
Discussion Thread
Greg Pettengill
2004-03-25 20:06:29 UTC
Linux EMC computer
Greg Pettengill
2004-03-25 20:26:52 UTC
Linux EMC computer
jeffalanp
2004-03-25 20:42:42 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
ibewgypsie
2004-03-26 02:14:03 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Sven-Åke Larsson
2004-03-26 06:03:51 UTC
SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Lane Barry
2004-03-26 07:36:30 UTC
re: Linux EMC computer
Jon Elson
2004-03-26 08:46:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Andy Wander
2004-03-26 08:52:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
ibewgypsie
2004-03-26 09:21:12 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
ibewgypsie
2004-03-26 09:22:03 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
jeffalanp
2004-03-26 09:34:49 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Paul
2004-03-26 09:50:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
k8zre
2004-03-26 12:28:40 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Thomas Fritz
2004-03-26 15:08:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Keith Bowers
2004-03-26 15:50:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Jon Elson
2004-03-26 20:33:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Ron K
2004-03-26 20:49:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
dakota8833
2004-03-27 05:29:39 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Sven-Ake Larsson
2004-03-27 05:50:46 UTC
SV: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
ibewgypsie
2004-03-27 05:54:56 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Paul
2004-03-27 07:58:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Paul
2004-03-27 08:25:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Ron K
2004-03-27 10:02:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Ron K
2004-03-27 15:01:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
ibewgypsie
2004-03-27 17:21:51 UTC
Linux EMC computer/Bdi-Live_rc23.iso
Jon Elson
2004-03-27 22:41:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
dakota8833
2004-03-28 07:01:55 UTC
Re: Linux EMC computer
Greg Pettengill
2004-03-31 22:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer
Jon Elson
2004-04-01 10:06:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Linux EMC computer