Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-11-05 21:27:14 UTC
kadeshan wrote:
240 Oz-In for a PEAK torque is getting pretty small. I think you could
save the day by going to a belt reduction drive, or going to a bigger motor.
You might need to go to a 4:1 belt drive, and then up the power supply
voltage if you run out of voltage at the high speed end.
Jon
>Jon,Oh, the ratings on your motors seem to be shrinking message by message!
>I am using gecko 320's and a 36v 25 amp power supply. I am using
>Mach 2, when I jog the machine they fault, but I can go to mdi
>screen and type g01 x1 f2 and they will run that way, but they also
>fault out from time to time doing that. They are you 15 lb-in servos
>which would be 240 oz-in. Or atleast thats what I figured it to be,
>which might be my problem.
>
>
240 Oz-In for a PEAK torque is getting pretty small. I think you could
save the day by going to a belt reduction drive, or going to a bigger motor.
You might need to go to a 4:1 belt drive, and then up the power supply
voltage if you run out of voltage at the high speed end.
Jon
Discussion Thread
kadeshan
2004-11-05 05:42:54 UTC
Gecko Faults
R Rogers
2004-11-05 05:58:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko Faults
Bloy2004
2004-11-05 05:58:57 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
kadeshan
2004-11-05 06:31:31 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
Bloy2004
2004-11-05 06:47:13 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
danialsan2
2004-11-05 08:53:41 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
Jon Elson
2004-11-05 09:01:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Gecko Faults
Bloy2004
2004-11-05 09:05:37 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
kadeshan
2004-11-05 10:45:38 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
R Rogers
2004-11-05 10:53:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults
R Rogers
2004-11-05 11:03:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults
kadeshan
2004-11-05 12:14:27 UTC
Re: Gecko Faults
R Rogers
2004-11-05 16:26:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults
Jon Elson
2004-11-05 21:27:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults
Jon Elson
2004-11-05 21:28:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Gecko Faults